Re: Exchange recovery questions...
From: Scott (mcdonsco_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/11/04
- Next message: Jaclynn Hiranaka [MSFT]: "Re: 12002 errors in event viewer."
- Previous message: Ken Ewert [MSFT]: "Re: Exchange recovery questions..."
- In reply to: Ken Ewert [MSFT]: "Re: Exchange recovery questions..."
- Next in thread: Ken Ewert [MSFT]: "Re: Exchange recovery questions..."
- Reply: Ken Ewert [MSFT]: "Re: Exchange recovery questions..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:58:50 -0800
hey, one last quick question for you. Veritas never once reported any errors
with the exchange store when backing it up - now it's reporting an error
that the database is corrupted every time I try and restore it. IT restores,
but just reports that it's corrupted and thus the recovery exchange server
wont mount it.
I know I shouldn't do this, trust me I know, but the only system/drives I
have available to do this with had only a 40GB drive the store is 45GB so I
compressed the drive to get it to fit (which it does now). Is this the sole
reason it says it's corrupted, or should this still work?
-- Scott McDonald "Ken Ewert [MSFT]" <MS-kene@no.microsoft.spam.com> wrote in message news:%232qzPGP8DHA.2472@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > no problem. I am going to over simplify things here so hopefully you will > pick up on what I'm saying. > > Exchange's database uses a transactional logging scheme (like other > traditional database application). Thus as changes / transactions occur > to the database , the changes are recorded in transaction logfiles as well. > If you restore from a backup, you have 2 choices. 1) restore the database > as it was at the time of the backup 2) restore the database and replay the > transactions that occurred *SINCE* the backup was done and therefore you can > mature the database back upto the point of failure. > > In answer to your question below, Yes.. .without the use of ScanOST, the > mail will remain in the local OST. > > > Thx > Ken > > "Scott" <mcdonsco@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:OZXwtPO8DHA.452@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > I'm not sure what you mean by "rolling logs forward"? > > > > Without using scanost.exe does that just mean that the emails would remain > > in the users ost on their system and not be copied back to the server > store? > > Then if scanost.exe is used once it's finished their outlook client will > > copy the emails from the OST to the server? > > > > Sorry, I'm very very new to exchange and thsi is my first having to deal > > with a recovery. Thanks for your help. > > > > -- > > Scott McDonald > > "Ken Ewert [MSFT]" <MS-kene@no.microsoft.spam.com> wrote in message > > news:eoGa2KO8DHA.360@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > > > If you are saying that the exchange server as recovered to a previous > > point > > > in time (ie restored to the last backp without rolling logs forward) > then > > > those messages will be left in the local copy of the client. There is > a > > > tool in the Outlook binaries called ScanOST.exe I believe that if you > run > > it > > > against that OST it will end up re-syncing the "local only" content back > > > upto the server. > > > > > > If you are saying that the database was not recoverd but instead a new > > > database started, then Outlook (in cached mode) will not re-connect to > the > > > new database / mailbox . Again, same way to recover the data via > > ScanOST > > > tool OR you can move your OST content to a PST, then re-create your > > > Outlook profile to point to the "new" mailbox and then mount the PST to > > the > > > new mailbox and drag the content back into your new OST and push it upto > > the > > > server. > > > > > > Thx > > > Ken > > > "Scott" <mcdonsco@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > > news:uNhbG3N8DHA.2656@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > > > If users are using outlook 2003 in cache mode and the exchange server > goes > > > down taking some data with it in store/database corruption, when it > comes > > > back online will exchange delete the emails from the users ost file > > thinking > > > "I don't have them so they shouldn't either" or will it copy those > emails > > > back into the exchange store thus recovering those emails from the > client > > > computers? > > > > > > I'm curious because we currently run outlook 2000 and our exchange > server > > > went down last week and there was some corruption in the store. Fixing > > that > > > lost a significant amount of data. I configured a recovery server only > to > > > find that the store had been corrupted for a few days before it went > down > > > (and nicely enough Veritas recognized and reported the store was corrupt > > on > > > restore, but not when it had backed it up). So I was thinking outlook > 2003 > > > could prevent this from being a problem if it ever happens again, but > not > > if > > > exchange will just delete the emails from the users ost file once it's > up > > > and running again. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > -- > > > Scott McDonald > > > > > > > > > > > >
- Next message: Jaclynn Hiranaka [MSFT]: "Re: 12002 errors in event viewer."
- Previous message: Ken Ewert [MSFT]: "Re: Exchange recovery questions..."
- In reply to: Ken Ewert [MSFT]: "Re: Exchange recovery questions..."
- Next in thread: Ken Ewert [MSFT]: "Re: Exchange recovery questions..."
- Reply: Ken Ewert [MSFT]: "Re: Exchange recovery questions..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading