Re: Tracking Log entries vs. physical mails

Thank you Kirill,

Of course, I've searched all MS site for similar keywords and read all found
articles before posting to this group.

Kind Regards,
Yuri.

"Kirill Palagin" <kpalagin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:430DC4C7.4CF8C059@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Yuri Ivanov wrote:
>
>> <snip>
>> time1 - serv - rec1 - 1027 - msgID1 - 4 - orig1 -
>> time2 - serv - rec2 - 1027 - msgID1 - 4 - orig1 -
>> time3 - serv - rec3 - 1027 - msgID1 - 4 - orig1 -
>> time4 - serv - rec4 - 1027 - msgID1 - 4 - orig1 -
>
> Wouldn't msgID be the same for the message delivered to several
> recipients?
>
>>
>>
>> By another hand, it was found out during the investigation of different
>> situations, that the events of messages to the same recipients are
>> organized
>> into groups (several records one after another, not separated by empty
>> record). There are no empty strings to delimit messages (as on example
>> above). Also, number of recipients always corresponded to the number of
>> lines and time of event was always the same (time1=time2=time3=time4).
>>
>> !! The question: is there any official documentation about handling of
>> physical messages in the e2k(3) tracking log. Or could someone confirm
>> that
>> result of my investigations will happen always and we may 100% consider
>> such
>> records as related to the single physical message.
>
> Have you seen articles
> http://support.microsoft.com/search/default.aspx?spid=730&query=message+tracking+log+format&catalog=LCID%3D1033&pwt=false&title=false&kt=ALL&mdt=0&comm=1&ast=1&ast=2&ast=3&ast=8&ast=9&mode=a&x=17&y=7
>
>>
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Yuri.
>


.