Re: Public Store question

Hi Msadexchman,

In Exchange 2k and 2k3 you can have multiple Public folder Hierarchies
(tress). Each new Tree that you create is an Application tree and is only
accessible via non-MAPI means. What Tree a public folder store is
associated with is defined by the value you are looking at "Associated
public folder tree". The only way to "change" this value is to remove the
public folder store completely and create a new one that is associated with
the correct public folder tree.

Please note that you can only have one Public folder store per server per
tree. So if you have another public folder store already on this server and
it is associated with the MAPI tree then the other public folder store is
"extra" and you may want to determine if it is being used before removing
it.

255077 HOW TO: Create a New Public Folder Tree and Store in Exchange
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=255077

Hope this Helps,
--
Matthew Byrd
Microsoft PSS

Run Microsoft Exchange Server Best Practices Analyzer Today
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads/2003/exbpa/default.mspx

When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

"msadexchman" <msadexchman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23G6utJ1pFHA.3432@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hello,
>
> We're still in a mixed mode 5.5/2003 Exchange environment. We do have one
> "pure" Exchange 2003 Admin Group consisting of 3 servers. We just noticed
> some issues. If I look at the public folder stores of two servers, the
> "associated public folder tree" points to the correct site/server (it's a
> different admin group). If we look at the 3rd server, the value is
> pointing to itself (admin group for which it belongs).
>
> I want to change that 3rd server to reflect what all the other do, is that
> possible? From the server that holds the public folder tree, I went into
> replicas on one of the PF's and was able to add the two servers mentioned
> above, but that 3rd one having issues wasn't even in the list?
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks
>


.

Relevant Pages
Loading