Re: Can I install CA Etrust AntiVirus Exchange Option on my Exchange 2
- From: "Mark Arnold [MVP]" <mark@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 18:18:32 +0100
On Wed, 4 May 2005 08:40:07 -0700, Hooper
<Hooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I am thinking about putting a local virus scanner on my Exchange 2003 server.
> I am currently running Exchange 2003 on a Windows 2003 server. I would be
>installing Computer Associates Etrust AntiVirus 7.1 Exchange Option.
>
>I have heard a lot of horror stories about this causing problems, even
>corrupting your exchange server. A lot of sites actually do not recommend
>it, but why would Etrust put out a product like this then? I would like
>information as to what directories to exclude from scanning and just any
>information as to how to install a antivirus program on an exchange server.
>
>Any help would be grealty appreciated.
>
>Thanks
The bottom two on the preference list tend to be GroupShield (a truly
dire product) and anything by CA. Trend tend to be towards the top and
the de facto standard is Sybari which licences other peoples
signatures on its own engine. It's not the cheapest solution though.
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Slow File copy
- Next by Date: WAN connection between two Exchange 2000 servers
- Previous by thread: Can I install CA Etrust AntiVirus Exchange Option on my Exchange 2
- Next by thread: Slow File copy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
