Re: Exchang 2000-Outlook

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry

From: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] (lanwench_at_heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmail.atyahoo.com)
Date: 07/31/04


Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 08:38:44 -0400

Anver wrote:
> thank sfor the info,
> Yes there are some reason.but main reason is 1
> 1. Some of the users required to install our own
> application patch or programs. Log in as a user to domain
> is limiting the user to install this kind of patches.
> Is there any way the user can install application while
> logging to the server as user.

Yes, if you add the user to the computer's local administrator group. (or
add Domain Users to the local administrators group).
>
> 2. Can I have this option in Exchagne2000 , all the users
> send and receive mail to be copied or forwarded to a
> particular mail box- possible?

Yes, see
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;261173&Product=exch2k
>
> 3. which is best to have - all the mail download to the
> user's pc as outlook.pst or .ost

Leave everything in the mailbox - if users need offline access, set them up
with OST files for syncing to a local file.
See
http://www.swinc.com/resources/exchange/faq_db.asp?status=questions&faqID=1000&faqname=Exchange%205.5&sectionID=1013&sectionName=Why%20PST%20=%20BAD
or http://tinyurl.com/2zx9a

>
> pls advice
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> "Anver" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I have windows2000 SBS, and 30 users(using win2k, xp and
>>> 98), my issue is that none of that client is directly
>>> loggin into domain. This is just like a workgorup setup.
>>> Server is DC, each user's, their log in info (username and
>>> password) is exaclty as created in the active directory.
>>> Now I am planning to have Exchange server which comes with
>>> SBS2000. My question is with this condition of setup -
>>> Exchange with Outlook is going to work?
>>>
>>> help pls
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Anver
>> You can continue to use the "connect as" type of method. I do ask why
>> you need to since the box is a DC? Is there any reason why you can't
>> join the machines to the domain?
>>
>> Mark Arnold MCSA MCSE+M MVP,
>> FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm
>> Blog: http://www.msexchange.me.uk
>> .



Relevant Pages

  • Re: New Computer
    ... Another reason I hate Windows! ... Now my recent experience kind of ticked me off because I had installed my version of Word XP onto my original desktop when I purchased it, then put it on the other family computer for the girls and their school work and then finally onto my laptop. ... Eventually I purchased a new desktop and had to reinstall it and I had to call Microsoft to get a new activation code. ... Six months later, my husband is home from his surgery and I gave him the laptop to play with - eventually ended up with a virus that I just could not get completely rid of so I reformatted the harddrive and had to reinstall, again no issues, but I did have to call Microsoft also this time to install. ...
    (sci.med.transcription)
  • Re: Wow... Windows... Looking for definitive answer
    ... laptop with Windows XP Pro. ... I want to install IIS. ... is Home Edition, you will not be able to install IIS. ... in this thread for some reason) is the above. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment)
  • Re: Wow... Windows... Looking for definitive answer
    ... laptop with Windows XP Pro. ... I want to install IIS. ... is Home Edition, you will not be able to install IIS. ... in this thread for some reason) is the above. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment)
  • Re: Wow... Windows... Looking for definitive answer
    ... laptop with Windows XP Pro. ... I want to install IIS. ... is Home Edition, you will not be able to install IIS. ... in this thread for some reason) is the above. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment)
  • Re: WARNING:DO NOT UPGRADE TO CORE 4
    ... >> X, but an upgrade might. ... > Then you've created a totally unique situation where the reason it works ... The reason for this - although this is not strictly relevant - ... but the simple fact is that a clean install does not work - ...
    (Fedora)