Re: Sample security Code is not working!

Hi Hennings,

I have fixed that in the current version. The thing is - currently, I am
ordering the anonymous group together with normal users - that is, it may
end up between two groups.


I didnt get you this. How 'anonymous ' end up between groups? if you order
the anonymous group together with normal users?

Regards

Rajesh


"Henning Krause" wrote:

I have not taken a look at the sample code.

However, I have my own logic to manipulate security descriptors (See my
exchange package - but the version on the net (0.95) is flawed - it will
not order the security descriptor correctly when groups are added).


Up to now, I haven't ran into any issues with the systems manager.

Best regards,
Henning Krause

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit my website: http://www.infinitec.de
Exchange access library -
http://www.infinitec.de/software/nettoolbox/infinitec.exchange.aspx


"Raj" <Raj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:23E27345-C7C5-4E2C-9391-A71482683182@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Henning,

I also had the same feeling but why sample security code is breaking ESM
if
there are valid DLs as members!
I think, the format used by sample security code is like this

User1: Allow
User1: Deny
User2: Allow
User2: Deny
DL1: Allow
DL2: Allow
DL3: Allow
Anonymous : Allow
DL1: Deny
DL2: Deny
DL3: Deny
Anonymous : Deny
EveryOne: Allow

Correct me if I am wrong. Is it possible for you to check what really
happening in your end with sample code.


Thanks

Rajesh



"Henning Krause" wrote:

AFAIK, well known groups (albeit the Everyone and Anonymous) are handled
equally to normal groups.

Best regards,
Henning Krause

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit my website: http://www.infinitec.de
Exchange access library -
http://www.infinitec.de/software/nettoolbox/infinitec.exchange.aspx


"Raj" <Raj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1C66D931-0A7E-4821-895A-036743785AFF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Henning,

Please check for me. Thanks...

also I tried this and working fine

User1: Allow
User1: Deny
User2: Allow
User2: Deny
Anonymous : Allow
Anonymous : Deny
DL1: Allow
DL2: Allow
DL3: Allow
DL1: Deny
DL2: Deny
DL3: Deny
EveryOne: Allow

I dont know how to order other well-know groups?(if any exists)

Thanks again
Regards

Rajesh
"Henning Krause" wrote:

Hello,

well, if it does not break ESM, then it is certainly correct :-)

I will look into this this evening...

Best regards,
Henning Krause

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit my website: http://www.infinitec.de
Exchange access library -
http://www.infinitec.de/software/nettoolbox/infinitec.exchange.aspx


"Raj" <Raj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:49BDB5AA-2C52-461A-8086-AA3D3D4E8D85@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
HI Henning,

odd and even means same
DL1: Allow
DL2: Allow
DL3: Allow
DL1: Deny
DL2: Deny
DL3: Deny

but what about anonymous? If i consider anonymous as a DL, ESM
breaks!
Sample security code do the same isnt it?

So I cahnged ordering like this

Anonymous : Allow
Anonymous : Deny
User1: Allow
User1: Deny
User2: Allow
User2: Deny
DL1: Allow
DL2: Allow
DL3: Allow
DL1: Deny
DL2: Deny
DL3: Deny
EveryOne: Allow

Is that right?

Thanks for the response

Rajesh
"Henning Krause" wrote:

Hello,

what do you mean with odd mask and even mask?

DL must be ordered first by allow mask and then deny mask

User1: Allow
User1: Deny
User2: Allow
User2: Deny
DL1: Allow
DL2: Allow
DL3: Allow
DL1: Deny
DL2: Deny
DL3: Deny
EveryOne: Allow

Best regards,
Henning Krause

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit my website: http://www.infinitec.de
Exchange access library -
http://www.infinitec.de/software/nettoolbox/infinitec.exchange.aspx


"Raj" <Raj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:B3C8564B-DE29-4680-9033-845687356761@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Please help me on this. I am not able to move forward . If Dls
are
members
of
the folder, I can update folder but getting 'Window handle
exception'
when
try to add/update folder permission using ESM. This is format I
use
to
write
user, groups and well know groups

1. Sort First Users Second Groups and Alias, third others(well
knowns)
and
last '/Everyone'
2. Clean Masks
2. Create user's SD for each mask
3. Create Group, Alias, and Well know groups(except 'everyone')
SD
for
each
even mask
4. Create Group, Alias, and well know groups(Except 'everyone')
SD
for
each
odd mask
5. Create SD for 'Every one' for all mask...

Any problem in that ordering?

Please help.

Thanks in Advance

Rajesh

"Raj" wrote:

Hi,

After updating a folder member (only DL ) using sample code
provided
in
Exchange SDK, tried to update the same folder using ESM and got
WIndows
handle exception!. If no group present in the folder, i am able
to
update
the
folder member without any issue! any one face same issue? what
might
be
the
problem?

Could you please send me Latest LoadSaveDacl.js file and
Security.js
file
....

Thanks

Rajesh








.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Sample security Code is not working!
    ... DL1: Deny ... If i consider anonymous as a DL, ESM breaks! ... what do you mean with odd mask and even mask? ... > the folder, I can update folder but getting 'Window handle exception'> when ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange2000.development)
  • Re: Sample security Code is not working!
    ... DL1: Deny ... If i consider anonymous as a DL, ESM breaks! ... what do you mean with odd mask and even mask? ... the folder, I can update folder but getting 'Window handle exception' when ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange2000.development)
  • Re: Sample security Code is not working!
    ... Anonymous: Deny ... DL3: Deny ... what do you mean with odd mask and even mask? ... the folder, I can update folder but getting 'Window handle exception' ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange2000.development)
  • Re: Sample security Code is not working!
    ... the format used by sample security code is like this ... Anonymous: Deny ... well, if it does not break ESM, then it is certainly correct :-) ... what do you mean with odd mask and even mask? ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange2000.development)
  • Re: Sample security Code is not working!
    ... "Henning Krause" wrote: ... Anonymous - Deny ... not order the security descriptor correctly when groups are added). ... what do you mean with odd mask and even mask? ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange2000.development)