Re: RPC over HTTPS question
- From: "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" <lanwench@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:05:42 -0400
In news:uLwjcxUlGHA.1040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Pierre Bru <Pierre.Bru@xxxxxxxxxxxx> typed:
hi,
I'm about to setup RPC over HTTPS.
my boss does no wants to a public (verisign or other) certificate but
one that has to be in each and every remote PC. well. why not (he's
the boss) but he also want this certificate to be 1) password
protected, 2) different for each user.
I think 1 is easy but what about 2?
TIA,
Pierre.
What is his intended purpose here? I don't think he understands what SSL
certificates are.
You can easily create a self-signed certificate and use that (although it
can be a bit of extra work to initially get them on the devices), but
there's no password protection, and each user will have to use the same cert
to access the server.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RPC over HTTPS question
- From: Pierre Bru
- Re: RPC over HTTPS question
- References:
- RPC over HTTPS question
- From: Pierre Bru
- RPC over HTTPS question
- Prev by Date: Re: IMF Effectiveness
- Next by Date: Re: RPC over HTTPS question
- Previous by thread: RPC over HTTPS question
- Next by thread: Re: RPC over HTTPS question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|