Re: Hiding Address Lists??

From: Mark Arnold [MVP] (mark_at_mvps.org)
Date: 01/24/05 

Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:34:15 +0000

I was working on the principle that you might be better using
different GALs rather than different ALs. I think there's something
out there to cover what you seem to be saying now.
I'll see if I can find it tonight, meanwhile someone else will
probably read this and give the answer based on the clarifications so
far.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Hiding Address Lists??
    ... >I was working on the principle that you might be better using ... > different GALs rather than different ALs. ... > probably read this and give the answer based on the clarifications so ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange2000.misc)
  • Re: Hiding Address Lists??
    ... >I was working on the principle that you might be better using ... > different GALs rather than different ALs. ... > probably read this and give the answer based on the clarifications so ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange2000.clients)
  • Re: Hiding Address Lists??
    ... >I was working on the principle that you might be better using ... > different GALs rather than different ALs. ... > probably read this and give the answer based on the clarifications so ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange2000.connectivity)
  • Re: Hiding Address Lists??
    ... >I was working on the principle that you might be better using ... > different GALs rather than different ALs. ... > probably read this and give the answer based on the clarifications so ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange2000.admin)
  • Re: Hiding Address Lists??
    ... >I was working on the principle that you might be better using ... > different GALs rather than different ALs. ... > probably read this and give the answer based on the clarifications so ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange2000.general)
Loading