Re: Exchange Performance
From: Edensys (systems_at_NOSPAMedeninc.com)
Date: 04/12/04
- Next message: KMG: "Re: Help! Domain Admins Permissions Have Been Removed from Mailbox Store"
- Previous message: Dan Garmer: "Can't manage Public Folders in a remote site/subdomain"
- In reply to: Nicholas Basile\(MSFT\): "Re: Exchange Performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 08:41:33 -0700
A lot of my users get 'waiting for exchange' boxes every
time they go to the public folders or large folders in
their own mailboxes. My remote users are complaining that
synching has become almost an all day event. Admittedly,
some people have large mailboxes (up to 800MB) but I have
a limit set to 80MB for the general staff. Every now and
again I get the waiting message by just changing messages
in my own inbox. The only thing in my system log is some
browser fight messages and account messages. The app log
has the regular 9582 - virtual memory fragmented messages.
I just ran a week long monitor of the counters to make
sure it wasn't just a one-day problem. Those same
counters that I listed below are still the ones above MS's
recommendations. The only other thing I noticed was this
one:
MSExchange IS MB Counters
Send Queue Size (mine 1.046) (MS recommends approx 0)
Everything I see, with the exception of the send queue
size and TCP segment received has to do with memory. I'm
just not sure what to do. I already have 2GB in there
with a 4GB pagefile on the OS partition.
Any recommendations? :)
Thanks for the posts,
Edensys
>-----Original Message-----
>What type of performance issues are you seeing? Are
there errors or warnigs
>in the application logs?
>
>
>--
>Nicholas Basile(MSFT)
>nicbas@online.microsoft.com
>Microsoft PSS
>
>Please do not send email directly to this alias is for
newsgroup purposes
>only!.
>This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
confers no rights.
>
>"edensys" <systemsNOSPAM@edeninc.com> wrote in message
>news:19b6801c41ceb$9d419630$a301280a@phx.gbl...
>> Its an oldie.
>>
>> PowerEdge 2300
>> 2 X Pentium II 400 MHz
>> 2 GB - 4 X 512 MB DIMM, 100 MHz ECC
>> 4 X 36 GB, SCSI, Ultr160 10K rpm
>> RAID-5, all four drives
>>
>> The server can have up to 120 users connected. Most of
>> the time its around 70 or so.
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >What is the spec of your machine? (CPU, memory and
>> disks). Also, how many
>> >users?
>> >
>> >--
>> >Neil Hobson
>> >Exchange MVP
>> >
>> >For Exchange news, links and tips, check:
>> >http://www.msexchange.co.uk
>> >
>> >"edensys" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
in
>> message
>> >news:1770201c418dd$6eada7d0$a301280a@phx.gbl...
>> >> I am trying to find some help on figuring out what I
>> need
>> >> to do improve performance on my exchange server. I
read
>> >> through 'Troubleshooting Microsoft Exchange 2000
Server
>> >> Performance' and started monitoring the counters.
>> >>
>> >> Here are the counters that are not where they are
>> supposed
>> >> to be based on Microsofts recommendations, what
should I
>> >> do??? -
>> >>
>> >> Counter My Server - Recommended
>> >>
>> >> Memory Counters
>> >> - Page faults /sec Med - Low
>> >> - Pages /sec High - Low
>> >>
>> >> MSExchangeIS Counters
>> >> - VM Largest Block Size 21.9 MB - > 32MB
>> >> - VM Total 16-MB Free Blocks 2.721 - > 3
>> >>
>> >> Process Counters
>> >> - Virtual Bytes 5.4 GB - < 2.8GB
>> >>
>> >> TCP Counters
>> >> - Segments Received /sec Med - High
>> >>
>> >> All other counters are the same or below MS
>> >> recommendations. It looks like a memory problem to
>> me...
>> >> does anyone agree or have any resource documents I
can
>> >> look at?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Edensys
>> >
>> >
>> >.
>> >
>
>
>.
>
- Next message: KMG: "Re: Help! Domain Admins Permissions Have Been Removed from Mailbox Store"
- Previous message: Dan Garmer: "Can't manage Public Folders in a remote site/subdomain"
- In reply to: Nicholas Basile\(MSFT\): "Re: Exchange Performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
