Re: Cisco Unity and Exchange 2k
From: Andy Webb (awebb_at_swinc.com.spamsucks.com)
Date: 03/15/04
- Next message: Andy Webb: "Re: Cannot access Public Folders through ESM"
- Previous message: Janaka: "mx records"
- In reply to: Russ: "Cisco Unity and Exchange 2k"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 00:51:11 -0600
The Unity system can do voicemail for users without email boxes.
It can also run in a standalone Exchange environment if you prefer, in which
case the users wouldn't have passwords to the AD accounts, rather only to
the voicemail interface. (pretty much what Russ said)
"Russ" <russ.johnson@tfe-waco.com> wrote in message
news:c7c001c408bf$cc2b9300$a101280a@phx.gbl...
> I've never had anyone ask this, but I would think that if
> you want them to have voice mail and not email, then you
> also don't want them checking their voice mail from
> outlook or owa. If that is the case, i would simply
> create a user/password in ADS and then associate that
> person's extension to that user account. That way they
> can still check messages from their phone, but the user
> won't be any the wiser about the email account.
>
> might try it...
>>-----Original Message-----
>>Any Cisco Unity users out here? Does any one know of a
> way that I can create
>>a Exchange 2k Mailbox ( Required for voicemail) but
> restrict that user from
>>configuring Outlook to utilize email. We have a series
> of users that have to
>>have voicemail but we don't want/need them to have email
> capabilities
>>
>>
>>.
>>
- Next message: Andy Webb: "Re: Cannot access Public Folders through ESM"
- Previous message: Janaka: "mx records"
- In reply to: Russ: "Cisco Unity and Exchange 2k"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
