Re: Exchange 2000 in a domain where another Exchange 2000 already existed
- From: "Kailash" <kjalabhay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:36:08 +0200
Thanks Leif,
The "old" exchange server was also a domain controller and I was thinking to
try to implement the new one as a member server only.
I did find a solution (though not the best probably) for the problem. I
carried our an update /removeorg on the root dc and re-installed exchange on
the temp server with the same organization name. I did have to delete all
exchange attributes for previous email users and then I used a prf file to
modify configuration on Oulook clients to redirect them. I was thinking that
once I retrieve the backups, I'll implement a new exchange server where all
the mails will be moved and merged back with the older mails (using
exmerge).
Kailash
"Leif Pedersen [MVP]" <leif.pedersenNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%239C0YsvqFHA.3640@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hi,
>
> You won't be able to install a secondary exchange server under a new
> organization name. You can only host one exchange organization in one
> active
> directory forest.
>
> Why don't you install the new server with the same name as the original
> server?
>
> Doing this means that you won't have to redirect Outlook clients.
> You won't have to delete and recreate exchange attributes for the user
> accounts.
> And when you have recovered the old mailboxes you just import these into
> the
> new mailboxes using exmerge.
>
> Leif
>
> "Kailash" <kjalabhay@xxxxxxxxx> skrev i en meddelelse
> news:%23L7QEJYqFHA.3680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I currently have a situation where due to major hardware problems my
>> exchange server is down. I wanted to allow users to send and receive
>> mails
>> while I work on the recovery of the old server which I believe will be
>> taking some time due to corrupted backup etc...
>>
>> Has anyone ever tried to install a second Exchange 2000 server in an
>> organization (under a different organization name) that already had an
>> Exchange server? I hoping that there isn't any major AD implications
>> which
>> would prevent the new "temporary" Exchange to perform its duties... can
>> anyone confirm?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Kailash
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
.
- Next by Date: Site and Orgainization Name
- Next by thread: Site and Orgainization Name
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading