Re: SATA SAN Performance
- From: "Mark Arnold [MVP]" <mark@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 22:06:33 +0100
I'd seriously question the use of the SAN for this one, unless you're
using a lot more other services on it, in which case the advice from B
and N are a tadge flawed. The size of the mailboxes isn't an issue
when it refers to the disks on which the store resides but will have
an effect when the size of the server comes into play. I know Nick's
throughput and compared to his, you could run your Exchange on a 386SX
and still be in good shape!
My question to you would be, what else are you planning on putting on
this SAN?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SATA SAN Performance
- From: Bharat Suneja [MVP]
- Re: SATA SAN Performance
- References:
- Re: SATA SAN Performance
- From: Nick Gillott [MVP]
- Re: SATA SAN Performance
- Prev by Date: Re: Disaster Recovery #3
- Next by Date: Re: Exchange 2003 SP2 Installation on SBS 2003
- Previous by thread: Re: SATA SAN Performance
- Next by thread: Re: SATA SAN Performance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|