Re: e3k upgrade - hardware spec



In article <2D1CF46D-FA93-4BE0-9078-4EE366F95AC3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
George <George@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I just joined a company that is running E3k SP1 on a single CPU box with
> Xeon 2.8Ghz processor with 2Gb of RAM. Trend Micro Scan Mail is also
> installed on the box as well as iHateSpam. TrendMicro is reporting between
> 45000 and 85000 messages scanned per day. This is on the backend server.
> The front end one is a slower machines which is currently setup to send all
> outbound mail and handle few OWA users...
>
> I'd like to replace both machines, but am unsure of the spec and
> configuration of the new machines. I'd like to have a cluster to increase
> availability, but am not sure whether I need the front-end - we haven't got
> many OWA users and more powerful machine should be able to handle the
> outbound mail. We also have NetApp IP SAN so the new cluster will have its
> data on it. The exchange store is split up in two storage groups with five
> stores - all about 80Gb. Both machines in the cluster will be xeon maybe with
> 4Gb RAM, but I would appreciate any advise from techies who have been down
> this road before.

George, if the hardware you've already got is handling the load OK, why
replace it now? I'm not sure that moving to a cluster will buy you any
availability, because I don't know how comfortable you are with
designing and maintaining a cluster. I'd say that you don't need more
RAM or CPU horsepower unless you're having performance problems.

With Exchange 12 on the horizon, you'll probably want to take advantage
of its 64-bit support. That argues in favor of buying 64-bit hardware,
which is already widely available. However, there's no point in buying
replacement servers now unless you need them-- the same amount of money
will buy you more capability in six or twelve months if you can hold off.

If you have a more complicated environment, or just like to play with
beta tools, have a look at Microsoft's new capacity planning tool,
System Center Capacity Planner. You can get a beta from
<http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/systemcenter/evaluation/cap
acity/default.mspx>.

Cheers,
-Paul

--
Paul Robichaux <paulr@xxxxxxxx>
MVP - Exchange
Exchange security book: http://www.e2ksecurity.com
FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm &
http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq.htm
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Setting up Exchange Cluster with AD
    ... To keep it simple install the OS and Exchange on C:\. ... > What specifically needs to be the same on the clustered machines? ... >> install a DC on your cluster. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • Re: Setting up Exchange Cluster with AD
    ... MS do not support a AD domain controller in a clustered environment so don't ... MS recommends that your cluster nodes be identical but it is not required ... as it relates to Exchange binaries and data has to be consistent. ... > Do the machines need to be identical hardware? ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • Re: Exchange 2007 SP1 Standard Edition - SCR on a Windows 2003 Clu
    ... Mailbox roles and manually start Exchange ... services in case a windows cluster fail-over occurs (Windows cluster active ... active node as an SCR source and the passive node as an SCR target? ... the windows cluster so that they don't have to change Exchange server IP/name ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.setup)
  • Re: Exch 2003 SP2 - applied on one node, but cant move resources
    ... resources to Node2, the failover did not complete because 'system attendant' ... Virtual Exchange server and failover occurred normally again upon taking ... cluster resources oline. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • Exchange 2007 cluster install - interesting note on an SCC installation
    ... I got my client/hub server setup just fine, and then when I went to my ... the install was going smoothly but then I noticed in the cluster ... I was using during the Exchange install was 10.40.32.170. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.setup)