Re: Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- From: "Brian Desmond [MVP]" <desmondb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:20:47 -0500
If you're getting an invalid cert error when you http to the url, that's the
issue. Get that resolved and you should be on your way w/ rpc/http.
--
--Brian Desmond
Windows Server MVP
desmondb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.briandesmond.com
"Harold Bruce" <HaroldBruce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:61EBBF87-EECE-451E-BBFE-45B88A513445@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Brian,
>
> We are using a cert issued by Geotrust. Now, this is where is gets
> complicated...
> The university I work for has some strange rules. The A record entries
> match the actual host name, which is quite long. We have a CName pointing
> to
> the A record which is slight shorter and more descriptive. When we were
> issued our cert, it was issued for the Cname, and worked fine. The CName
> also had an assocaiated MX record. They (univeristy system) changed the
> "policies" to where you could not have a MX record match a CName or A
> record.
> This means that the site named in the cert is just an MX record and cannot
> be accessed via a browser. Now, when you visit Exchange via the web
> interface, either by going to the Cname, A record or IP address, you get a
> security alert saying the name on the cert is invalid or does not match
> the
> name of the site.
>
> On my XPSP2 laptop, either inside or outside our firewall on campus (all
> ports are open), I get the same security warning via IE. BUT, I can still
> connect succesfully with Outlook configured for RPC over HTTP, using the
> Exchange server's A record, which as stated above, in a browser, gives a
> security alert.
>
> Again, this leaves me to believe my ISP is doing something, but I have no
> clue what. I asked them what ports they block, and was given this list:
> tcp 135
> udp 135
> udp 137
> udp 138
> tcp 139
> tcp 445
> udp 445
> tcp 593
> tcp 4444
> udp 4444
> tcp 27374
>
> Any other ideas??
>
> Thanks.
> harold
>
> "Brian Desmond [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> Phil,
>>
>> Harold is using RPC/HTTP. This works over HTTP ports NOT RPC ports. So
>> that
>> wont' be the case.
>>
>> Harold - are you using a valid https cert on the frontend (and it was
>> issued
>> by someone lke thawte or verisin)? That makes a differenece.
>>
>> --
>> --Brian Desmond
>> Windows Server MVP
>> desmondb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> www.briandesmond.com
>>
>>
>> "Phil Hunt" <hunt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:ONSsHNVOFHA.3296@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > This is probaby due to your home isp/broadband provider closing all the
>> > RPC
>> > ports 'for your protection'
>> >
>> > Pretty bad that you cannot run the client at home. If you have a user
>> > on
>> > the road for weeks, the only way they can connect is vpn (not
>> > practical
>> > for
>> > dialup foreign connections (way too slow)), or pop/imap, or dialup
>> > using
>> > ras
>> > on the exchange server.
>> >
>> > Groupwise can use its client at home using TCP and 2 ports.
>> >
>> > Any 3rd party apps that would allow w2k systems to connect?
>> >
>> >
>> > "Harold Bruce" <HaroldBruce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> > news:DE68DC65-198C-4F68-BD5D-D90D66FE4FF9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> Brian,
>> >>
>> >> We actually had them remove all port blocking for the IP associated
>> >> with
>> > our
>> >> Exchange 2003 server. Via wireless or wired on the same subnet
>> >> (inside
>> > our
>> >> firewall), we can successfully connect to the exchange server. Across
>> >> campus, on a totally different subnet (outside the firewall, although
>> >> all
>> >> ports are open for the exchange server), we can via wireless or wired
>> > connect
>> >> via RPC over HTTP.
>> >>
>> >> At home, using a broadband ISP, neither myself or my assistant cannot
>> >> connect successfully. What do I need to look at? Is there any way to
>> > trace
>> >> from home or setup tracing on the exchange server to see what the deal
>> >> is?
>> >> We have tried using the DNS name and IP address, with the same
>> > non-results.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks!
>> >> harold
>> >>
>> >> "Brian Desmond [MVP]" wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Harold-
>> >> >
>> >> > The only thing you need open facing the world is port 443. All those
>> > other
>> >> > ports - opening them negates the whole idea of rpc/http and leaves
>> >> > your
>> >> > server wide open for the world.
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > --Brian Desmond
>> >> > Windows Server MVP
>> >> > desmondb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >
>> >> > www.briandesmond.com
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > "Harold Bruce" <Harold Bruce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>> >> > message
>> >> > news:CE0C7650-B83B-4471-B83B-F02823E5325A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> > >I have an Exchange 2003 (SP1) single server that I have configured
>> >> > >for
>> > RFC
>> >> > >or
>> >> > > HTTP. It works great if we are inside the firewall, but outside,
>> >> > > it
>> > never
>> >> > > connects. I know it is a firewall issue because we turned the
>> > firewall
>> >> > > off
>> >> > > for the IP of the server.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > My question is: what ports are required to be open for RFC over
>> >> > > HTTP?
>> >> > > I had the following ports open: 110, 995, 25, 143, 993, 80, 21,
>> >> > > 443,
>> > 691,
>> >> > > 389, 3268, 88, and 135.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > We actually run SurfControl on the server, so it is listening on
>> >> > > port
>> > 25
>> >> > > while Exchange is set to listen on port 26. Do I need to open
>> >> > > port
>> > 26?
>> >> > > Is
>> >> > > there anything I am missing?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- From: Harold Bruce
- Re: Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- References:
- Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- From: Harold Bruce
- Re: Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- From: Brian Desmond [MVP]
- Re: Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- From: Harold Bruce
- Re: Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- From: Phil Hunt
- Re: Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- From: Brian Desmond [MVP]
- Re: Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- From: Harold Bruce
- Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- Prev by Date: Re: Upgrade 2000 to 2003
- Next by Date: Re: Should I upgrade me Exchange Server in a 2000 environment?
- Previous by thread: Re: Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- Next by thread: Re: Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|