Re: Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- From: "Brian Desmond [MVP]" <desmondb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:10:15 -0500
Phil,
Harold is using RPC/HTTP. This works over HTTP ports NOT RPC ports. So that
wont' be the case.
Harold - are you using a valid https cert on the frontend (and it was issued
by someone lke thawte or verisin)? That makes a differenece.
--
--Brian Desmond
Windows Server MVP
desmondb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.briandesmond.com
"Phil Hunt" <hunt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ONSsHNVOFHA.3296@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> This is probaby due to your home isp/broadband provider closing all the
> RPC
> ports 'for your protection'
>
> Pretty bad that you cannot run the client at home. If you have a user on
> the road for weeks, the only way they can connect is vpn (not practical
> for
> dialup foreign connections (way too slow)), or pop/imap, or dialup using
> ras
> on the exchange server.
>
> Groupwise can use its client at home using TCP and 2 ports.
>
> Any 3rd party apps that would allow w2k systems to connect?
>
>
> "Harold Bruce" <HaroldBruce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:DE68DC65-198C-4F68-BD5D-D90D66FE4FF9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Brian,
>>
>> We actually had them remove all port blocking for the IP associated with
> our
>> Exchange 2003 server. Via wireless or wired on the same subnet (inside
> our
>> firewall), we can successfully connect to the exchange server. Across
>> campus, on a totally different subnet (outside the firewall, although all
>> ports are open for the exchange server), we can via wireless or wired
> connect
>> via RPC over HTTP.
>>
>> At home, using a broadband ISP, neither myself or my assistant cannot
>> connect successfully. What do I need to look at? Is there any way to
> trace
>> from home or setup tracing on the exchange server to see what the deal
>> is?
>> We have tried using the DNS name and IP address, with the same
> non-results.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> harold
>>
>> "Brian Desmond [MVP]" wrote:
>>
>> > Harold-
>> >
>> > The only thing you need open facing the world is port 443. All those
> other
>> > ports - opening them negates the whole idea of rpc/http and leaves your
>> > server wide open for the world.
>> >
>> > --
>> > --Brian Desmond
>> > Windows Server MVP
>> > desmondb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> > www.briandesmond.com
>> >
>> >
>> > "Harold Bruce" <Harold Bruce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>> > message
>> > news:CE0C7650-B83B-4471-B83B-F02823E5325A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > >I have an Exchange 2003 (SP1) single server that I have configured for
> RFC
>> > >or
>> > > HTTP. It works great if we are inside the firewall, but outside, it
> never
>> > > connects. I know it is a firewall issue because we turned the
> firewall
>> > > off
>> > > for the IP of the server.
>> > >
>> > > My question is: what ports are required to be open for RFC over HTTP?
>> > > I had the following ports open: 110, 995, 25, 143, 993, 80, 21, 443,
> 691,
>> > > 389, 3268, 88, and 135.
>> > >
>> > > We actually run SurfControl on the server, so it is listening on port
> 25
>> > > while Exchange is set to listen on port 26. Do I need to open port
> 26?
>> > > Is
>> > > there anything I am missing?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- From: Harold Bruce
- Re: Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- References:
- Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- From: Harold Bruce
- Re: Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- From: Brian Desmond [MVP]
- Re: Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- From: Harold Bruce
- Re: Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- From: Phil Hunt
- Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- Prev by Date: unable to replicate public foler from 2K to 2K3
- Next by Date: Upgrade of Exchange Disk Drives and Movement of Database
- Previous by thread: Re: Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- Next by thread: Re: Open Ports required for RFC over HTTP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|