Re: Exchange server 2003 deployment
From: Mikaël PLOUHINEC (mp_at_cerealog.fr)
Date: 04/22/04
- Next message: jay: "receiving mail"
- Previous message: Kyle Lewallen [MSFT]: "Re: Moving mailboxes to new Exchange 2003 server"
- In reply to: Mark Arnold [MVP]: "Re: Exchange server 2003 deployment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:39:34 +0200
Mark Arnold [MVP] a écrit :
> Mikaël PLOUHINEC <mp@cerealog.fr> wrote:
>
>
>>Mark Arnold [MVP] a écrit :
>>
>>
>>>Mikaël PLOUHINEC <mp@cerealog.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi.
>>>>
>>>>I need some help. Before I had an Exchange server 5.5 on a Active
>>>>Directory (mixte mode). I have installed Exchange 2000 in order to test
>>>>it. So everything was OK except the AD connector because (I don't knwo
>>>>why) it was impossible to communicate with the Exchange 5.5 server. I
>>>>notice that in my administration console, I have already my exchange
>>>>server 5.5 and my exchange server 2000.
>>>>My Exchange 5.5 was on my nt domain server. My exchange 2000 is not on a DC.
>>>>
>>>>Now I want to install two (because of redundancy) Exchange 2003
>>>>server(on a non DC controller), delete all the others in my Organization
>>>>in order to have a "clean" domain. I have a lot of data in my exchange
>>>>database (mails and public folders) so I would like to keep everything.
>>>>
>>>>But I don't know exactly how I can do that. Does someone could help me?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks a lot
>>>
>>>
>>>Use this:
>>>http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;273478
>>>to completely clean your AD.
>>>Use Exmerge to get all of the mailbox data out to PST and use Outlook
>>>to get all PF data out to PST
>>>
>>>What do you mean by redundancy? Having two server won't give you any
>>>mailbox redundancy as you can't replicate mailboxes.
>>>
>>>
>>>Mark Arnold MCSA MCSE+M MVP, mark@mvps.org
>>>FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm &
>>>http:http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq.htm
>>>Blog: http://www.msexchange.me.uk
>>
>>By redundancy I mean that I want two exchange 2003 server in which the
>>mailboxes and all the datas are present. When a server goes down, I
>>would like to use the other one with little manipulation (I'd like on ly
>>Outlook parameters on clients).
>>
>>I see the page at thu URL you give me. It is for exchange 2000. How can
>>I remove totally the exchange 5.5 server(it appears in the
>>administration console on my exchange 2000 server)? When do I have to do
>>this? For me, I think that I install my exchange server 2003, I transfer
>>the mailboxes and all the public folders (I don't know how!) and I
>>delete the exchange 5.5 and 2000 server.
>>
>>Any idea?
>
>
>
> No can do out of the box. For this you would need some solution like a
> Cluster or the Legato Co Standby Server.
>
> Exchange 5.5 doesn't get itself into AD or anything so geting the mail
> out is the same and then firstly doing and uninstall of Exchange 5.5
> then closing the box down is suficient and will remove the box from
> ESM.
>
> So are you happy with the E2K in the domain or not? If the E2K is in
> good shape then you can just deploy Exchange 2003 and replicate the PF
> data. The deployment and What's new Guides at
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/2003/library/default.mspx
> will help you get E2k3 into the E2K environment properly.
> If you are doing this kind of migration you can follow this
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;307917 to get
> rid of the E2K server when you're ready.
>
>
> Mark Arnold MCSA MCSE+M MVP, mark@mvps.org
> FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm &
> http:http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq.htm
> Blog: http://www.msexchange.me.uk
What do you mean about "closing the box"?
I'm not happy with my Exchange 2000 because I install it on a poor
(considering performance) server in order to test it, but we have a lot
of problem. So we buy a new server and we want to install Exchange 2003
on it in order to not have our actuals problems.
I'm sorry with my questions, but my boss give me this work and I don't
knwo anything about Exchange.
- Next message: jay: "receiving mail"
- Previous message: Kyle Lewallen [MSFT]: "Re: Moving mailboxes to new Exchange 2003 server"
- In reply to: Mark Arnold [MVP]: "Re: Exchange server 2003 deployment"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
