Re: Migration EX5.5 -> EX2k3; cleaning first site

From: Juan (Juan_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 11/11/04


Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:29:06 -0800

Thats it?

Okay, thanks.

Juan

"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 06:04:05 -0800, "Juan"
> <Juan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >we're currently migrating from excange 5.5 / nt4 to excange 2003 / active
> >directory.
> >We've installed Exchange 2003 servers in most of our Exchange 5.5 sites.
> >Now we want to start to remove the old servers one by one from the old sites.
> >
> >I search something like a cookbook. Something what will tell me all the steps.
> >
> >Thanks in advanced
> >
> >
> >Juan
>
> Get your chefs hat on:
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=822450&product=exch2003
>
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Migration EX5.5 -> EX2k3; cleaning first site
    ... Juan ... >>Thats it? ... >>Okay, thanks. ... Too many people format the box and ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.misc)
  • PDC Server Not Appearing Network Neighbourhood <-- Heavy Duty Help Required !
    ... Ping the PDC machine by IP address all okay ... backup servers retrieved from master AM-PE4600ENIGMA ... There are 0 servers in domain ACTIVE_MEDIA on transport ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Re: PartyGammon - warning
    ... example and I can keep the beginners at low stakes on most servers all ... first someone says TMG has only world class players, I answer, thats ... then someone states to make 20K at TMG I have to play 18 hours a day, ...
    (rec.games.backgammon)
  • Re: Fives again? Ah yeah, again and again...
    ... Big Ole Butt ... Thats some serious wackness. ... Okay so you may WTF the first, ... Hiphop almost shuns it completely and when it doesn't it comes out with ...
    (rec.music.hip-hop)
  • Re: 2.6.23 kernel
    ... Thats correct Scott RH4, sorry but once bitten twice shy, I am very happy not using vendor kernels as they tend to be too bloated anyway, core servers only need small kernels, enough to run what they need to, no need to have built in network crud i'll never use, no need to have 30K modules inplace that will never be used, vendors do this so its a plug and play type OS, thats fine for a desktop, not fine for a server. ... I've never had them rendered unbootable by a vendor kernel ...
    (Fedora)