Re: IOPS and megacycles calculations
- From: TonyP <TonyP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:25:58 -0700
Hi John
Working away frantically here .. let you know my update in a bit but I need
to know something where are you getting this information from?
" If I take a 15K FC SCSI spindle for example, I get 130 IOPS at
20ms and over 200 IOPS at 60ms. When the spindles get overloaded to a point
(about 400 IOPS for our example 15K FC spindle) the IOPS/spindle doesn't go
up any more and the response time gets longer and longer as the load
increases."
How do u know this?
Also
"(1,500 × 2/3) + ((1,500 × 1/3) × 2) = 2,000
Applying the same scenario on a RAID-5 array, your actual hardware IOPS is:
(1,500 × 2/3) + ((1,500 × 1/3) × 4) = 3,000
If all of your drives are 10,000 RPM, you will need at least 30 drives to
obtain your required IOPS in a RAID-5 configuration. If you implement RAID-1
or RAID-10 instead, then you would need at least 20 drives (you can't have a
RAID-1 or RAID-10 solution with an odd number of disks)."
How are you (or they) working out these values?
I have a gap here in my knowledge that I need to address to understand
things further on!!
Tony
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IOPS and megacycles calculations
- From: stuart clark \(kelico\)
- Re: IOPS and megacycles calculations
- References:
- Re: IOPS and megacycles calculations
- From: John Fullbright [MVP]
- Re: IOPS and megacycles calculations
- From: TonyP
- Re: IOPS and megacycles calculations
- From: John Fullbright [MVP]
- Re: IOPS and megacycles calculations
- From: TonyP
- Re: IOPS and megacycles calculations
- From: John Fullbright [MVP]
- Re: IOPS and megacycles calculations
- Prev by Date: re-create all the Exchange system folders
- Next by Date: Re: IOPS and megacycles calculations
- Previous by thread: Re: IOPS and megacycles calculations
- Next by thread: Re: IOPS and megacycles calculations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|