Re: Server Logic
- From: "Phil" <Phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:45:02 -0800
Is that not the purpose of technology? But that will take us out of the
topic for this group. I will take your 'No' to mean that it is not
technically possible to strip an attachment from an email, save it to a file
and replace the attachment with a link all within the exhange server.
Thanks for the responses.
"Asher_N" wrote:
> No.
>
> You aer trying to use technology to solve a human problem. It doesn't
> work.
>
>
> "=?Utf-8?B?UGhpbA==?=" <Phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> news:3C11791C-9AE0-46B2-BA94-E7808A8C543A@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
> > Thanks for the suggestion but my users seem to be married to thier pst
> > files.
> > I guess it masked some performance issues that the previous IT guy
> > was
> > unable to deal with. In a perfect world.... Anyways I am looking to
> > ease the users down a better road, security blankets in hand. That is
> > why I am looking for alternatives, is there a way to do what I am
> > proposing?
> >
> > "Asher_N" wrote:
> >
> >> OK. If a link will do, I assume that these users are local. Then it
> >> begs the question, why the .pst??
> >>
> >> Go MAPI. External access can be by OWA, VPN or RPC over HTTP.
> >>
> >> "=?Utf-8?B?UGhpbA==?=" <Phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> >> news:E0323B82-F8B7-4FC4-8945-D95CF6AC8292@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> >>
> >> > The issues that I have are two fold, first the users are having
> >> > their emails delivered to pst files that are grwoing rapidly and
> >> > are corrupting. Secondly, the management has not yet decided that
> >> > this is a problem so I am trying to avert serious client-side
> >> > issues that I will have to deal with over and over again. Yes an
> >> > educated user is the ideal solution but I don't have the political
> >> > clout to make that happen, so I work beneath the radar.
> >> >
> >> > "Asher_N" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "=?Utf-8?B?UGhpbA==?=" <Phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> >> >> news:083A5E57-8BF0-449F-B10F-2EDDE9674C27@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> >> >>
> >> >> > I am using exchange 2003 and have users that send large
> >> >> > attachments to a number of receipients within the organization.
> >> >> > I would like to set up some server side logic to minimize the
> >> >> > impact of sending these large attachments. The scheme that I
> >> >> > have in mind is to have the users address thier email to a
> >> >> > specialized mailbox, with the actual receipients in the cc
> >> >> > field. The special mailbox would strip the attachment from the
> >> >> > email and place it on our intranet then replace it with a link
> >> >> > that the receipients can click on to view the attachment. All
> >> >> > recipients would receive the link only. Can this be done? Any
> >> >> > ideas about a how? any alternatives you can think of?
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> The attachement will only reside in your store once. There is no
> >> >> major impact with sending internal attachments. Or you could try
> >> >> to educate the users to send links instead of files.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
.
- References:
- Re: Server Logic
- From: Asher_N
- Re: Server Logic
- From: Asher_N
- Re: Server Logic
- From: Asher_N
- Re: Server Logic
- Prev by Date: Re: Server Logic
- Previous by thread: Re: Server Logic
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|