Re: Running Exchange 2000 and 2003 simutaniously for different purpose
- From: "Isaac Weathers" <Isaac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:50:00 -0400
I'll do that. Thanks!
Isaac
"Al Mulnick" <amulnick_No_SPAM@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OuB0D2IrFHA.2072@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I'm sure there are some, I just haven't used any I can recommend.
> Might be worth it to look to some of the open source projects to see
what's
> available there that can be modified for your needs.
>
> Al
>
> "Isaac Weathers" <Isaac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:%23yjbXMDrFHA.2896@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Thanks for the response and info.
> >
> > I'm not familiar with LCS... I'll look into it. Any suggestions for
other
> > IM
> > server products?
> >
> > Isaac
> >
> > "Al Mulnick" <amulnick_No_SPAM@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:uWQowsOqFHA.712@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Tsk Tsk. Microsoft really should return phone calls and emails :)
> >> Check out the upgrade and readme docs. It specifically talks about
this
> >> type of situation. Short answer is yes, you can run a separate
Exchange
> >> 2000 server while the rest are at 2003 and only put the mailboxes on
the
> >> 2003 servers.
> >>
> >> Kind of a silly thing to do vs. adding in LCS or some other IM server
> >> product in my mind, but it can be done.
> >>
> >> Al
> >>
> >> "Isaac Weathers" <iweathers(NOSPAM)@gaupc.com> wrote in message
> >> news:BD1E09D7-D4FF-45FE-A950-E5997A7AB838@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > We are currently using Exchange 2000 and are utilizing the IM
> >> > functionality
> >> > available. In Exchange 2003 I see that that functionality has been
> >> > taken
> >> > away. I understand that Microsoft has incorporated that function into
> >> > another
> >> > application suite. However, my question is this. Can we run Exchange
> > 2000
> >> > to
> >> > house our IM profiles and Exchange 2003 for the mailboxes? So that we
> >> > don't
> >> > lose any functionality without having to purchase another application
> >> > suite?
> >> >
> >> > I spoke with someone from Microsoft several months ago who stated
that
> >> > they
> >> > "thought" that this type of configuration was possible. But they
never
> >> > confirmed. Does anyone know if that is correct?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for your help in advance!
> >> >
> >> > Isaac
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
.
- References:
- Running Exchange 2000 and 2003 simutaniously for different purpose
- From: Isaac Weathers
- Re: Running Exchange 2000 and 2003 simutaniously for different purpose
- From: Al Mulnick
- Re: Running Exchange 2000 and 2003 simutaniously for different purpose
- From: Isaac Weathers
- Re: Running Exchange 2000 and 2003 simutaniously for different purpose
- From: Al Mulnick
- Running Exchange 2000 and 2003 simutaniously for different purpose
- Prev by Date: Re: Running Exchange 2000 and 2003 simutaniously for different purpose
- Next by Date: Re: Synchronising Exchange servers
- Previous by thread: Re: Running Exchange 2000 and 2003 simutaniously for different purpose
- Next by thread: Exchange 2003 & DC/GC Changes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|