Re: Running Exchange 2000 and 2003 simutaniously for different purpose
- From: "Al Mulnick" <amulnick_No_SPAM@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:33:46 -0400
I'm sure there are some, I just haven't used any I can recommend.
Might be worth it to look to some of the open source projects to see what's
available there that can be modified for your needs.
Al
"Isaac Weathers" <Isaac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23yjbXMDrFHA.2896@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Thanks for the response and info.
>
> I'm not familiar with LCS... I'll look into it. Any suggestions for other
> IM
> server products?
>
> Isaac
>
> "Al Mulnick" <amulnick_No_SPAM@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:uWQowsOqFHA.712@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Tsk Tsk. Microsoft really should return phone calls and emails :)
>> Check out the upgrade and readme docs. It specifically talks about this
>> type of situation. Short answer is yes, you can run a separate Exchange
>> 2000 server while the rest are at 2003 and only put the mailboxes on the
>> 2003 servers.
>>
>> Kind of a silly thing to do vs. adding in LCS or some other IM server
>> product in my mind, but it can be done.
>>
>> Al
>>
>> "Isaac Weathers" <iweathers(NOSPAM)@gaupc.com> wrote in message
>> news:BD1E09D7-D4FF-45FE-A950-E5997A7AB838@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > We are currently using Exchange 2000 and are utilizing the IM
>> > functionality
>> > available. In Exchange 2003 I see that that functionality has been
>> > taken
>> > away. I understand that Microsoft has incorporated that function into
>> > another
>> > application suite. However, my question is this. Can we run Exchange
> 2000
>> > to
>> > house our IM profiles and Exchange 2003 for the mailboxes? So that we
>> > don't
>> > lose any functionality without having to purchase another application
>> > suite?
>> >
>> > I spoke with someone from Microsoft several months ago who stated that
>> > they
>> > "thought" that this type of configuration was possible. But they never
>> > confirmed. Does anyone know if that is correct?
>> >
>> > Thanks for your help in advance!
>> >
>> > Isaac
>>
>>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Running Exchange 2000 and 2003 simutaniously for different purpose
- From: Isaac Weathers
- Re: Running Exchange 2000 and 2003 simutaniously for different purpose
- References:
- Running Exchange 2000 and 2003 simutaniously for different purpose
- From: Isaac Weathers
- Re: Running Exchange 2000 and 2003 simutaniously for different purpose
- From: Al Mulnick
- Re: Running Exchange 2000 and 2003 simutaniously for different purpose
- From: Isaac Weathers
- Running Exchange 2000 and 2003 simutaniously for different purpose
- Prev by Date: Re: Running Exchange 2000 and 2003 simutaniously for different purpose
- Next by Date: Re: Running Exchange 2000 and 2003 simutaniously for different purpose
- Previous by thread: Re: Running Exchange 2000 and 2003 simutaniously for different purpose
- Next by thread: Re: Running Exchange 2000 and 2003 simutaniously for different purpose
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|