Re: Disk Partitioning on exch 2003
- From: "Al Mulnick" <amulnick_No_SPAM@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 18:02:16 -0400
The only suggestion that comes to mind with those limitations is that you
may want to consider changing the limitations of the disk. Putting the log
files on the same drive partition is not a best practice after years of
learning the hard way by many people. You really should consider getting
some other disks to put the log files.
If that's not possible, then putting the log files on the same drive as the
OS would likely yield better performance than putting them on a RAID 5
partition. If that's not a concern either, than I can't offer any other
suggestions :)
Al
"Brett W" <Postmaster.au@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:347e01c55abc$6977d660$a401280a@xxxxxxxxxx
> Hi All,
>
> We are currently implementing a new exch 2003
> implementation. I have read that certain partioning will
> give better performance of the exch server.
>
> We have a userbase of around 1200. The server has 6 73G
> disks with a single channel raid controller. 3G of Ram
>
> Im thinking that it would be best to make two disks raid 1
> for the OS and exch installation. Then making the other 4
> raid 5 however partitioned into two with the databases on
> one and the log files on the other.
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions or comments on what would
> be the best configuration for partitioning.
>
> Thanks
>
> Brett
.
- References:
- Disk Partitioning on exch 2003
- From: Brett W
- Disk Partitioning on exch 2003
- Prev by Date: Design Question
- Next by Date: Re: Migration
- Previous by thread: Disk Partitioning on exch 2003
- Next by thread: Exchange 2003 design for a organisation having multiple offices
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
