Re: Need help
- From: "Mikael P" <mikaelpehrsson@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 09:44:04 +0200
Client user use Outlook not as a mailsystem more like a file sending to
customers and so on. We typically get large e-mail like 20Mb or bigger but
thats is not a rule we also have user that are "offline" sitting in
customers office and normaly us webmail but they often send large mail back
to office with file attached.
\\Mikael
"Al Mulnick" <amulnick_No_SPAM@xxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:uPKYRq8VFHA.2700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> The answer is that it depends. What type of clients? What type of usage
> patterns? What type of message sizes? Expectations? and the list
> continues....
> "Mikael P" <mikaelpehrsson@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:uaI6k8fVFHA.3572@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> We are about to change our exchange enverirment from 2000 to 2003.
>>
>> Today we have 8 exchange server in our bigger offices more than 100
>> users. The new configuration is 2 servers for all our ~2500 users what
>> kind of bandwidth do we need to our offices without exchange servers. We
>> have today about 4Mb between the offices and we have lots of traffics ;)
>> do we need more? is it totally wrong to only build around 2 servers? or
>> do we need more?
>>
>>
>>
>
>
.
- References:
- Need help
- From: Mikael P
- Re: Need help
- From: Al Mulnick
- Need help
- Prev by Date: Problem getting Exchange 2000 to see AD 2003 GC
- Next by Date: Exchange 2003 Clustering with iSCSI and NetAPP (4+1)
- Previous by thread: Re: Need help
- Next by thread: Simple Query - Limiting e-mail message size in Exchange 5.5
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading