Re: Databases & Transaction logs on same spindle
- From: "Brian Desmond [MVP]" <desmondb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:19:48 -0500
You'd be much better off putting th elogs on the same spindle as the OS as
that's a RAID1 mirror set b/c of the write perf. The databases can go on the
other array.
--
--Brian Desmond
Windows Server MVP
desmondb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.briandesmond.com
"RAJ" <RAJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43AA0323-23A0-4037-8B90-C0CA0D1D5F65@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hello,
> In my now enviroment I have an Exchange 2003 Ent. edition server running
> on
> Win2K3 Standard edition.
> The person who built the server did the following:
> 6 drives; 2 drives mirrored w/ the OS (C:\) and 4 drives RAID 0+1 w/ the
> database & transaction logs (E:\).
> I'm having I/O performance issues on E:\ (Event ID 509)
> I want to seperate the database files and transaction log files and I
> don't
> want to blow away the RAID config.
> I'm thinking of putting the database files on C:\ w/ the OS.
> Would this be acceptable in terms of performance, stability & reliability?
> Comments; suggestions...
> Thank you.
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Databases & Transaction logs on same spindle
- From: Jim Schwartz
- Re: Databases & Transaction logs on same spindle
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Should I use a Front -End server
- Next by Date: OWA Problems Exchange 2003 keeps loading
- Previous by thread: Databases & Transaction logs on same spindle
- Next by thread: Re: Databases & Transaction logs on same spindle
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
