Re: Front-End server question

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance

From: Clayton Sutton (none_at_none.com)
Date: 03/03/05 

Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 08:59:35 -0600

How is this a substitute for ISA? Does it work better then ISA? Like I
said, I don't really want to use ISA.

Clayton

"Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" <rod@die.spam.die.nw-america.com> wrote in
message news:e00pvr3HFHA.2476@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> You mean like this one
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;821839? You will
> need Exchange 2003, 2000 did not support IPsec in this matter. I can tell
> you from personal experience that it works nicely :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rod
>
> MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
> http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering
> http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
>
> "Clayton Sutton" <none@none.com> wrote in message
> news:uYoVLi3HFHA.2656@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> Do tell more Rod. I like that idea. Got any white papers or links that
>> talk about it? I really don't like to have to use ISA.
>>
>>
>> Clayton
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Rodney R. Fournier [MVP]" <rod@die.spam.die.nw-america.com> wrote in
>> message news:O12bxb1HFHA.2700@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>> If you are not a fan of ISA. Put the FE's in the DMZ and use IPSec to
>>> the backend. That works nicely too.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Rod
>>>
>>> MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
>>> http://www.nw-america.com - Clustering
>>> http://msmvps.com/clustering - Blog
>>>
>>> "Russ Kaufmann" <russ@exchangemct.com> wrote in message
>>> news:e6W%23cU1HFHA.3928@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>>> "Ed Woodrick" <ewoodrick@ed-nospam-com.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:OLcs6Y0HFHA.2936@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>>>>> There is no specific need for different FE servers for the different
>>>>> domains. One FE server can handle the requirements of both.
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't put your FE servers in the DMZ. Put them on the internal
>>>>> network. If you need enhanced security, user a ISA server to reverse
>>>>> proxy the connection from the Internet.
>>>>
>>>> I agree with Ed here. Putting FEs in the DMZ can be really difficult to
>>>> configure properly, and it just doesn't make sense to me when you can
>>>> publish them back into the LAN.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Front-End server question
    ... Clayton ... > you from personal experience that it works nicely:) ... >> Do tell more Rod. ... I really don't like to have to use ISA. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.design)
  • Re: Front-End server question
    ... Clayton ... > you from personal experience that it works nicely:) ... >> Do tell more Rod. ... I really don't like to have to use ISA. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.connectivity)
  • Re: Front-End server question
    ... Clayton ... > you from personal experience that it works nicely:) ... >> Do tell more Rod. ... I really don't like to have to use ISA. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • Re: Front-End server question
    ... Clayton ... > you from personal experience that it works nicely:) ... >> Do tell more Rod. ... I really don't like to have to use ISA. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.misc)
  • Re: Front-End server question
    ... How is this a substitute for ISA? ... Clayton ... >> Do tell more Rod. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.connectivity)