Re: Deploy Exchange on DMZ or backend?
From: Jim Schwartz (shamusnc_at_poc.earthlink.net)
Date: 06/02/04
- Next message: Al Mulnick: "Re: Deploy Exchange on DMZ or backend?"
- Previous message: newguy: "Deploy Exchange on DMZ or backend?"
- In reply to: newguy: "Deploy Exchange on DMZ or backend?"
- Next in thread: Al Mulnick: "Re: Deploy Exchange on DMZ or backend?"
- Reply: Al Mulnick: "Re: Deploy Exchange on DMZ or backend?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 00:18:06 GMT
If you are trying to connect your clients to the Exchange servers and they
are on the internal network you don't need to install anything in a DMZ. If
you want to NAT port 25 that's fine. If you're looking to put OWA in place,
I would put that on your corporate network and use a proxy or ISA in the
DMZ.
In my opinion, I wouldn't ever put anything that I'm not willing to lose in
a DMZ.
"newguy" <akalogerakis_donttypethispart_@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:F125B4FE-7362-456C-BE84-2C2477C912A5@microsoft.com...
> Hello All,
>
> I am planning to deploy exchange 2003 in the next few months, but I have a
few questions. 1st, we are a company of about 100 users and maybe 150 email
addresses, we will be hosting this in our hosting environment, so i would
like to cluster exchange to have some type of redundancy. Now this will
obviously be a privately IP'd cluster, so should we just put a NAT in our
firewall and thats it? or should we put FE servers on a DMZ? and lastly, how
do you feel about ISA, is it a must when running exchange? Any help would be
great.
>
> Thank you
- Next message: Al Mulnick: "Re: Deploy Exchange on DMZ or backend?"
- Previous message: newguy: "Deploy Exchange on DMZ or backend?"
- In reply to: newguy: "Deploy Exchange on DMZ or backend?"
- Next in thread: Al Mulnick: "Re: Deploy Exchange on DMZ or backend?"
- Reply: Al Mulnick: "Re: Deploy Exchange on DMZ or backend?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
