Re: Exchange 2007 Email Routing
- From: "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" <bharat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:31:17 -0700
- The logical topology defined by AD site links is a layer on top of the physical network. AD replication and Exchange 2007 routing use the logical links defined.
- When defining AD Site Links, if you have a direct physical link between 2 Sites, it generally makes sense to have a logical Site link in AD as well.
- Having said that, even with the best path that logically traverses thru another location/AD Site, the first attempt is always to connect directly to the Hub Transport server(s) in the destination Site (unless a Hub Site is defined, in which case all messages must go through the HT server(s) in that Site).
--
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchange
www.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------
"Bill Jenner" <BillJenner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:437E4A8C-18D4-4B40-A3BD-A8B07525836D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I’ve been reading about how Exchange 2007 routes email and was hoping
somebody could help clarify my understanding?
I believe Exchange 2007 uses AD sites and the Inter-site Transport links
defined between sites to determine how to route an email within an AD
organization. According to the articles I’ve read it uses the costs defined
on the links to determine the least cost path to the destination Hub server
for the site where the mailbox server is located, but what actually happens
if the defined Inter-Site links do not match the actual network links that
physically exist?
For example if there were three sites in an organization A, B, and C which
are physically connected together in a triangle, but in AD sites there are
only Inter-Site connections defined from A to B and then from B to C. If an
email was going from site A to site C, although there is no link defined from
A to C in Sites and Services, surely from a network perspective the data
would be routed across the WAN link from A to C and not from A to B to C?
Can anybody advise me on this
Thanks,
Bill
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Exchange 2007 Email Routing
- From: Bill Jenner
- Re: Exchange 2007 Email Routing
- Prev by Date: Re: Out of Office autoreply on Exchange 2003
- Next by Date: Re: Outlook Full Client vs. OWC: Junk E-Mail Filter
- Previous by thread: Out of Office autoreply on Exchange 2003
- Next by thread: Re: Exchange 2007 Email Routing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|