Re: Exch 2007 Mailbox role sending to IMCEAEX System Attendant?
- From: "John Fullbright" <fjohn@donotspamnetappdotcom>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 21:23:16 -0800
one of the 4 problems in http://support.microsoft.com/kb/316622/en-us. To
fix it, the easiest method is #2, create a new store and move all the
mailboxes to it.
"Paul" <Paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:BC2BEDCE-9BE5-4BBE-8F55-A173428B7E63@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I dont follow you
Q: "why is that?"
A: because those are invalid addresses.
IMCEAEX-_O=DOMAIN_OU=EXCHANGE+20ADMINISTRATIVE+20GROUP+20+28FYDIBOHF23SPDLT+29_CN=Configuration_cn=Servers_cn=MAILBOXSERVER_cn=Microsoft+20System+20Attendant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
doesnt exist as an email address on my system.
Why is system attendant sending messages to an address that doesnt exist?
Is
this a system address>
"John Fullbright" wrote:
That the IMCEA encapsulation occurs is telling you that there is no valid
SMTP address for the recipient; exactly what the 550 is telling you. Why
is
that?
"Paul" <Paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:F2F14F21-A47A-4802-8195-526CE87C1FFE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Looking at our message tracking failed results, I see plenty of emails
from
our mail server going to addresses exchange cannot resolve and thus
failing.
I was curious what these emails are, and why the mailbox role is
spewing
them
out?
For example, the from address is:
MicrosoftExchange329e71ec88ae4615bbc36ab6ce41109e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
And the recipient address is:
IMCEAEX-_O=DOMAIN_OU=EXCHANGE+20ADMINISTRATIVE+20GROUP+20+28FYDIBOHF23SPDLT+29_CN=Configuration_cn=Servers_cn=MAILBOXSERVER_cn=Microsoft+20System+20Attendant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
And the message tracking shows the following error on this email:
550 5.2.0 RESOLVER.ADR.BadPrimary; recipient primary SMTP address is
missing
or invalid
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Exch 2007 Mailbox role sending to IMCEAEX System Attendant?
- From: John Fullbright
- Re: Exch 2007 Mailbox role sending to IMCEAEX System Attendant?
- From: Paul
- Re: Exch 2007 Mailbox role sending to IMCEAEX System Attendant?
- Prev by Date: Re: Exch 2007 Mailbox role sending to IMCEAEX System Attendant?
- Next by Date: Re: 452 4.3.1 Out of memory
- Previous by thread: Re: Exch 2007 Mailbox role sending to IMCEAEX System Attendant?
- Next by thread: Re: Exch 2007 Mailbox role sending to IMCEAEX System Attendant?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading