Re: Problems w. VPN connection over T-1
- From: "Asher_N" <compguy666@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 12:38:15 -0800
This looks like both ends of the tunnel share the same subnet.
They need to be on different subnets.
Can you use hardware routers to do the VPN? even somthing as simple as a
Cisco501 would do.
"=?Utf-8?B?QWRhbQ==?=" <Adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:E701C36B-B8AB-4BED-BFBE-EDC46A384713@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> I think Megapath's address space is /24 for this T-1
>
> Tunnel is established via Microsoft VPN
>
> This is of the Cali Office
> Active Routes:
> Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface
> Metric
> 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.5 192.168.10.1
> 20
> XX.XX.XX.XXX 255.255.255.255 192.168.10.5 192.168.10.1
> 20
> 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
> 1
> 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.1 192.168.10.1
> 20 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1
> 127.0.0.1 20
> 192.168.10.16 255.255.255.255 192.168.10.20 192.168.10.20
> 1 192.168.10.17 255.255.255.255 192.168.10.20
> 192.168.10.20 1 192.168.10.18 255.255.255.255
> 192.168.10.20 192.168.10.20 1 192.168.10.19
> 255.255.255.255 192.168.10.20 192.168.10.20 1
> 192.168.10.20 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
> 50
> 192.168.10.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.10.1 192.168.10.1
> 20
> 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.10.1 192.168.10.1
> 20
> 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.10.1 192.168.10.1
> 1
> Default Gateway: 192.168.10.5
>
> "Asher_N" wrote:
>
>> What is the address spece of the other office?
>>
>> How is the tunnel established?
>>
>> What do the routing tables look like?
>>
>>
>>
>> "=?Utf-8?B?QWRhbQ==?=" <Adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>> news:67FA25DA-9CA5-44D0-B3CB-2C466028324E@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>>
>> > I just setup two networks (one in Cali and the other in Mass). Both
>> > networks are on T1 lines. The Mass company VPNs into the Cali
>> > office to access the files and Exchange. There are 7 users in the
>> > Mass office. The main problem is that when they try to use Outlook
>> > it always says "Exchange is unavailable" the first time and then
>> > takes 3-5 minutes to load up into Outlook if I end up clicking
>> > "Retry", but this is not always the case.
>> >
>> > When I ping the main server NETBIOS name while I am VPN'd into it,
>> > it will give me the public IP. I added a host file entry for the
>> > NETBIOS name to point directly to the LAN IP. However, of course,
>> > when I check the name it shows the FQDN (and since the Cali server
>> > hosts their own e-mail) it will point back to the public IP it
>> > seems.
>> >
>> > Is there a way to correct this problem? I know that RPC always
>> > worked faster before it was blocked. RPC over HTTPS is problematic
>> > since they always have to login. It seems when I do other VPNs into
>> > Outlook its a bit faster. Any suggestions would be appreciated...
>> >
>> > NETBIOS name: server1
>> > FQDN: server1.domain.com
>> >
>> > Private scheme: 192.168.10.1 - 192.168.10.254
>> > server1 IP: 192.168.10.1
>> > router IP: 192.168.10.5
>> >
>> > Ports: 80, 443, 25, 110, and 1723 are open
>> >
>>
>>
>
.
- References:
- Re: Problems w. VPN connection over T-1
- From: Asher_N
- Re: Problems w. VPN connection over T-1
- From: Adam
- Re: Problems w. VPN connection over T-1
- Prev by Date: Re: Problems w. VPN connection over T-1
- Next by Date: Lotus Notes Connector: What ports do I enable on the Firewall?
- Previous by thread: Re: Problems w. VPN connection over T-1
- Next by thread: Lotus Notes Connector: What ports do I enable on the Firewall?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|