Re: Front-End server question
From: Rich Matheisen [MVP] (richnews_at_rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM)
Date: 03/04/05
- Next message: Diane Poremsky [MVP]: "Re: Exchange mailboxes and aliases"
- Previous message: BJ McGowan: "Exchange mailboxes and aliases"
- In reply to: Al Mulnick: "Re: Front-End server question"
- Next in thread: Clayton Sutton: "Re: Front-End server question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:27:22 -0500
"Al Mulnick" <amulnick_No_SPAM@ncDOTrr.com> wrote:
>It's not a substitute. It's a different concept altogether aimed at solving
>a different problem.
>
>IPSec solves the problem of n'er-do-wells lurking in your DMZ sniffing the
>line for information because it allows you to protect the transmission with
>encryption.
It also drives the Intrusion Detection System guys nuts. :)
-- Rich Matheisen MCSE+I, Exchange MVP MS Exchange FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
- Next message: Diane Poremsky [MVP]: "Re: Exchange mailboxes and aliases"
- Previous message: BJ McGowan: "Exchange mailboxes and aliases"
- In reply to: Al Mulnick: "Re: Front-End server question"
- Next in thread: Clayton Sutton: "Re: Front-End server question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
