Re: Least Cost Routing?
From: Ed Grant [MSFT] (edgrant_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 02/11/04
- Next message: Brian Conway: "Re: I need some help on an odd problem"
- Previous message: Ed Grant [MSFT]: "Re: Blocked or not?"
- In reply to: Puzzled Postmaster: "Least Cost Routing?"
- Next in thread: Puzzled Postmaster: "Re: Least Cost Routing?"
- Reply: Puzzled Postmaster: "Re: Least Cost Routing?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 09:47:08 -0500
You can't. In 5.5 once the message reaches the Q it has already been routed
and we do not have a way
to retrieve it and send it to a different IMS.
If the connection is going to be down for an extended period, remove the
address space from the connector that is down
and do a Recalculate Routing on Site Addressing, when the connection comes
back up re-add it and do the same thing.
-- Ed Grant Microsoft PSS This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Please do not reply directly to this e-mail address "Puzzled Postmaster" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:da8101c3f01c$eca431c0$a301280a@phx.gbl... > I have two 5.5 servers on NT4, both in the same site. > Each with a separate DSL connection (gateway) to the > internet and each with an IMC. If a destination host is > unreachable to deliver mail from one server, how can I > configure the site to try sending via the other server's > IMC? As it stands, the mail just times out in the > queue. I can't find how to configure the cost to > anything other than 1 (which both are set at).
- Next message: Brian Conway: "Re: I need some help on an odd problem"
- Previous message: Ed Grant [MSFT]: "Re: Blocked or not?"
- In reply to: Puzzled Postmaster: "Least Cost Routing?"
- Next in thread: Puzzled Postmaster: "Re: Least Cost Routing?"
- Reply: Puzzled Postmaster: "Re: Least Cost Routing?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|