Reply to all
Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:01:08 -0800
We have Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2000 clients. When we receive an email from
outside intended to a group of people if a user presses "Reply to All" its
own name is included in the "To field. When used inside the company the
"Reply to All" doesn't include its own name. Is this a normal behaviour and
if not is it any fix for it?
Thank you
Relevant Pages
- Re: Vista + Outlook 2007 + Exchange 2007 Errors
... Your question of why it only affects the clients it's affecting is the easy ... Outlook 2007 gets free/busy data from the availability ... FREE/BUSY have a replica on the public folder store on the Exchange 2007 ... exchange 2007 server account. ...
(microsoft.public.exchange.clients) - Re: Slow response in Outlook on SBS2003
... since all clients are experiencing slow response in using ... Make sure that you exclude the Exchange related folders so that they will ... Additionally, I suggest you upgrade the Outlook 2000, XP to Outlook 2003, ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs) - RE: Outlook access problems over VPN
... I have a suggestion for exchange, ... Works great and clients ... They just open up outlook whether ... > Exchange server when they are connected via the VPN to our network. ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs) - Re: Global Address List is sometimes not available
... I'd check the event logs on your DC's - this is an AD problem, not Exchange. ... versions of Outlook that use the OAB by default are Outlook 2003 and ... Specifically which clients are having issues with seeing the GAL? ... Win 2000 Domain with 2 DC and one Windows 2003 Server with Exchange ...
(microsoft.public.exchange.admin) - Re: The Item cannot be displayed in the preview pane
... Dbl-click scanpst.exe and browse to the pst file you're having ... the server mailbox and see if Exchange can fix them when it runs its ... >I have recently migrated users from outlook IO to Exchange on SBS2003. ... > and have also tried upgrading clients to OL2003 with the same results. ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs) |
|
