Re: Error with IMAP access
- From: JYA <jyavenard@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 20:31:45 -0700 (PDT)
Hi
On May 12, 1:05 pm, "Rich Matheisen [MVP]"
<richn...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
MAPI hasn't been changed in years. The number of bits used by the
hardware isn't the problem.
it is indirectly related.
To have such limitation in these days and age is just plain stupid.
And outright dangerous, as looking at it, you can *crash* any exchange
server in only a few minutes (just send a lot of email, all with a
unique x-header)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Error with IMAP access
- From: Rich Matheisen [MVP]
- Re: Error with IMAP access
- References:
- Error with IMAP access
- From: JYA
- Re: Error with IMAP access
- From: Andy David {MVP}
- Re: Error with IMAP access
- From: JYA
- Re: Error with IMAP access
- From: Andy David {MVP}
- Re: Error with IMAP access
- From: JYA
- Re: Error with IMAP access
- From: Rich Matheisen [MVP]
- Error with IMAP access
- Prev by Date: Re: Error with IMAP access
- Next by Date: Exchange 2007 Mail Attachments
- Previous by thread: Re: Error with IMAP access
- Next by thread: Re: Error with IMAP access
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|