Re: SCR and Replay Queue length
- From: guapoloco@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:12:35 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 8, 2:38 pm, guapol...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Feb 7, 9:02 am, Maverick <maver...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Currently there is a database file in there. If I delete it and the log
files on the target computer and run updatestoragegroup, a sub folder gets
create in the database folder named Temp-seeding with the proper name and
size of the database file. However, I get the error message that seeding
failed.
If I do a full database dismount and copy the file to an empty directory
after a clean enable-storagegroupcopy, the file copies fine and mounts
properly on the source. In this case, I get the 18000 log files in the
replayqueuelength. I see no errors or warnings in Event Viewer.
"Scott Schnoll [MSFT]" wrote:
So there is a database file there? If you empty out the folder, does
Update-SGC (when run from the SCR target computer) succeed?
--
Regards,
Scott Schnoll
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. Please do not send email directly to this alias. This alias is for
newsgroup purposes only.
"Maverick" <maver...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:CF6D55C0-137F-4804-B4AE-1403DE5A7BB1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If I do an attrib on the temp-seeding database.edb, I get an archive
attribute. Other than that nothing else is set. What's puzzling is that
this worked fine on the first 10 databases. Thanks again for your help.
"Scott Schnoll [MSFT]" wrote:
Are you also able to get the file attributes for the seeding directory
using
attrib?
--
Regards,
Scott Schnoll
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. Please do not send email directly to this alias. This alias is
for
newsgroup purposes only.
"Maverick" <maver...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:E2FCDB5C-49A3-49FA-A709-7DFB2A71390D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Scott,
Thanks for getting back to me. I have checked the permissions and
LocalSystem has full control. The partitions are also formatted as
NTFS.
"Scott Schnoll [MSFT]" wrote:
The specific error message you are getting internally means that the
seeding
directory does not exist. What I don't know is why you would get this
error
when the directory does exist. You might check permissions and make
sure
that LocalSystem has access.
Also, to confirm, the D and E partitions are formatted as NTFS,
correct?
--
Regards,
Scott Schnoll
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. Please do not send email directly to this alias. This alias is
for
newsgroup purposes only.
"Maverick" <maver...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:90E1D0A6-7C24-4FAC-9BAD-604131DB6B3E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Actually, the D: and E: drive are on a partitioned RAID 5 array. I
did
a
permon when trying to seed the database and didn't see anything out
of
the
ordinary.
"John Fullbright" wrote:
"My target mailbox server has a system drive (c:\) and the second
physical
local drive partitioned with D:\ and E:\ for the TX logs and
databases.
I
am
not sure if this is the issue or not."
On the destination, You have a single physical DAS spindle
logically
partitioned into D: and E: for logs and database?
I'd suspect an IO bottleneck is the reason behind the 18K+
copyqueuelength,
the divergence, and the failure to seed.
"Maverick" <maver...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5C52F210-F9C3-4D96-B56B-94A9FDC80E51@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
One more thing,
I have my source mailbox server configured on a SAN with the TX
logs
on
the
D:\ drive and the databases on a seperate SAN slice named e:\.
My target mailbox server has a system drive (c:\) and the second
physical
local drive partitioned with D:\ and E:\ for the TX logs and
databases.
I
am
not sure if this is the issue or not.
"Maverick" wrote:
Hi Scott,
The error message that I recieve when I do an
updatestoragegroupcopy
-identity 'mailserver\storage group1' -standbymachine
backupmailserver:
"Update-StorageGroupCopy : Seeding failed: Database seeding
error:
Continuous Replication seeding was provided a database path that
does
not
identify viable storage"
When I run a getstoragegroupcopystatus on the storage group that
is
failing
to seed the database, I get:
SummaryCopyStatus : suspended
CopyQueuelength: 18826
Replayqueuelenght: 0
LastLogInspectedLogTime: blank
I have checked to ensure the replication service is running.
The
other
storage group copies are working fine.
Thanks for your help and great job on the SCR videos on your
blog.
Maverick
"Scott Schnoll [MSFT]" wrote:
Well, you don't want replay to get too far behind either..
What
does
Get-StorageGroupCopyStatus (with the -StandbyMachine option)
show
for
the
storage group? Also, can you verify that the Replication
service
is
running
on the SCR target computer?
When you tried to seed with Update-SGC, what error message did
you
get?
--
Regards,
Scott Schnoll
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
confers
no
rights. Please do not send email directly to this alias. This
alias
is
for
newsgroup purposes only.
"Maverick" <maver...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message
news:41AE5BA9-3897-4DA2-9481-A6EA4AED93CE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi all,
I am running into something interesting with SCR. I have
enabled
it
on
about 10 databases without any issues. However, they were
mostly
small (2
gigs or less). I am trying to seed a 4 gig database and it
keeps
failing
to
seed when using the suspend-storagegroupcopy/update
storagegroupcopy.
So, I followed another way of doing it by dismounting the
production
database and then copying the edb file to the target server.
I
have
no
path
conflicts. After the copying is complete, I remount the
production
database
and do a resume-storagegroupcopy.
My problem is that the replay queue length stays at about
18000
logs
and
keeps growing. I thought that there was a delay of 50 log
files
and
24
hours
before replaying the logs on the target. When I do a
get-storagegroupcopystatus on the group, it comes back as
healthy
and
the
copy queue length is 0. Should I be worried about the
replay
queue
length?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Hi, I am running SCR across two AD sites:
I started seeding by update-storagegroupcopy, Mailbox database is
4.2GB, it displays the working [ooooooooooooooo] but never finishes,
if I run the command Get-StorageGroupCopyStatus | FL it shows
summaryCopyStatus as failed, with failed message saying The Microsoft
Replication Service is seeding on the passive node. Replication of
this storage group will begin automatically when this seeding
operation is complete.
Path for source is the default Program files\Microsoft\Exchange Server
\Mailbox\...
Path for target was free, deleted all files, I can see also the temp-
seeding folder.
It's pretty much a default installation, wondering if the size has
anything to do with seeding problems...- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Found the problem, it was the removal of a DC, started getting errors
EventID 9385, restarted IS and SA and now is showing ok.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SCR and Replay Queue length
- From: Scott Schnoll [MSFT]
- Re: SCR and Replay Queue length
- References:
- SCR and Replay Queue length
- From: Maverick
- Re: SCR and Replay Queue length
- From: Scott Schnoll [MSFT]
- Re: SCR and Replay Queue length
- From: Maverick
- Re: SCR and Replay Queue length
- From: Maverick
- Re: SCR and Replay Queue length
- From: John Fullbright
- Re: SCR and Replay Queue length
- From: Maverick
- Re: SCR and Replay Queue length
- From: Scott Schnoll [MSFT]
- Re: SCR and Replay Queue length
- From: Maverick
- Re: SCR and Replay Queue length
- From: Scott Schnoll [MSFT]
- Re: SCR and Replay Queue length
- From: Maverick
- Re: SCR and Replay Queue length
- From: Scott Schnoll [MSFT]
- Re: SCR and Replay Queue length
- From: Maverick
- Re: SCR and Replay Queue length
- From: guapoloco
- SCR and Replay Queue length
- Prev by Date: Re: Ethics and mailboxes
- Next by Date: Re: Tried everything, Can't receive e-mail from outside
- Previous by thread: Re: SCR and Replay Queue length
- Next by thread: Re: SCR and Replay Queue length
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|