Re: Large Number of Storage Groups
- From: "Mike Abbaticchio" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 23:26:08 -0400
Yep.... We've got Blackberries and Treo's and we are in the process of
switching our domestic users over to Outlook Cache mode. I think once that
happens we will be in much better shape.
"Andy David {MVP}" <adavid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mfoed3h547no6s2ebi2nrk52p0nichqanr@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:00:00 -0700, Mike A <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Much of that depends on your user profile.
In of itself 2800 is not that high of a number of users, but throw in
large mapi client mailboxes, Blackberrys, Communicator, modular
messaging, cache vs. online mode, etc.. and having that number of
users on a server may not work for you.
EMC and Microsoft ( on the EHLO blog) can definetly provide guidance.
.
- References:
- Large Number of Storage Groups
- From: Mike Abbaticchio
- Re: Large Number of Storage Groups
- From: Ed Crowley [MVP]
- Re: Large Number of Storage Groups
- From: Mike Abbaticchio
- Re: Large Number of Storage Groups
- From: Mark Arnold [MVP]
- Re: Large Number of Storage Groups
- From: Mike A
- Re: Large Number of Storage Groups
- From: Andy David {MVP}
- Large Number of Storage Groups
- Prev by Date: Re: Large Number of Storage Groups
- Next by Date: Re: Large Number of Storage Groups
- Previous by thread: Re: Large Number of Storage Groups
- Next by thread: Re: Large Number of Storage Groups
- Index(es):
Loading