Re: How to specify an exchange 2003 as remote bridgehead?
- From: "JPTHSD" <jpthsd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 10:25:01 -0700
That's great hint.
We are also planning a year to go to Exchange 2007.
I think with an administrative group with only RGs, we
then can implement, design Hub, Edge transport easily without
confusion...etc.
Do you have any advice about Exchange 2007 Hub/Edge
design? Look like each of remote office, we should have
a Exch2007 Hub server and a dedicated Edge ..etc
Regards, thanks again for your advice!
JPTHSD
"Rich Matheisen [MVP]" <richnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:l749b35dhhl86jhv8od23f2kkm55oabp51@xxxxxxxxxx
"JPTHSD" <jpthsd@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You are right! in each of TW, Thailand administrative group, I moved
Exchange server to their own RG. So the server become master server in
there
(TW, Thailand)...this is what I'd like it to be, each of administrative
group has their own RG, and each of RG has a master server, we will
connect
RGs together by RG connector to link these RGs together?
That's the usual course of action. :-)
Now each of office like TW, Thailand has administrative group and an
exchange servers, they will have more exchange servers, but we will link
the 1st exchagne server from each administrative group location together
to
reduce the heavy bandwidth load ..etc..so on. Hmmm where do I create the
RG
connector? in each RG do i need to create SMTP connector or no?
In the Routing Groups container, in the Connectors container. If you
don't see the Routing Groups containers, select the organization
object and right-click it. From the "Properties" page, check the
"Display Routing Groups" check box.
You should start using "Routing Group" instead of "Administrative
Group" when you speak of message flow within your organization.
Although the default is to have a routing group container in each
administrative group, it's also possible to have an administrative
group that contains only routing groups and /NO/ servers. With that
configuration you can delegate control at the AG group for servers and
mailbox greation, but not give away control to local admins over the
way messages move within the organization.
--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address mailto:h.pott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How to specify an exchange 2003 as remote bridgehead?
- From: Rich Matheisen [MVP]
- Re: How to specify an exchange 2003 as remote bridgehead?
- References:
- How to specify an exchange 2003 as remote bridgehead?
- From: JPTHSD
- Re: How to specify an exchange 2003 as remote bridgehead?
- From: Rich Matheisen [MVP]
- Re: How to specify an exchange 2003 as remote bridgehead?
- From: JPTH
- Re: How to specify an exchange 2003 as remote bridgehead?
- From: Rich Matheisen [MVP]
- Re: How to specify an exchange 2003 as remote bridgehead?
- From: JPTHSD
- Re: How to specify an exchange 2003 as remote bridgehead?
- From: Rich Matheisen [MVP]
- How to specify an exchange 2003 as remote bridgehead?
- Prev by Date: Certificate install...
- Next by Date: Re: How to transparently move the SMTPC from E2K to a new E2K3 server.
- Previous by thread: Re: How to specify an exchange 2003 as remote bridgehead?
- Next by thread: Re: How to specify an exchange 2003 as remote bridgehead?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|