Separate spindles

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry

All, I've read all over the place that the transaction logs, and the DB's
should be on separate spindles. However, suppose we have a SAN with a ton
of disks raided together into a large volume. The only way we can separate
the DBs and the logs in that scenario is to partition out that volume. Does
that still count?

Thank you,
TP


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Drive Allocations for Exch2007 via iSCSI
    ... it makes sense to separate the Store files from the transaction logs on ... NEW blog location: ... some suggestions on Drive Allocation. ... We will be connecting the server to an iSCSI SAN. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • Re: Using both SAN and Direct Attached Storage
    ... transaction logs and RAID-5 for databases ). ... databases and transaction logs to the SAN (4 drives) or; ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.setup)
  • Re: Using both SAN and Direct Attached Storage
    ... and RAID-5 configuration) and we are planning to leverage our SAN environment ... We plan to move the databases to the SAN and leave ... continue using the internal RAID-1 to store the transaction logs. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.setup)
  • Re: E2K3 connected to SAN
    ... the centralised exchange server will ... My question do you put both Storage groups and transaction logs on the SAN ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.setup)
  • E2K3 connected to SAN
    ... Planning to migrate E55 org using move mailbox, major part of the migration ... the centralised exchange server will ... My question do you put both Storage groups and transaction logs on the SAN ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.setup)