Re: RPC over HTTP: Single server or FE/BE setup?
- From: "John Oliver, Jr. [MVP]" <jcoliverjr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:40:22 -0400
Unless there is dire need for a FE server in your environment a single server scenario will do just fine. I am going to provide good link explaining this and post back if you have any questions,
http://www.petri.co.il/configure_rpc_over_https_on_a_single_server.htm
--
John Oliver, Jr
MCSE, MCT, CCNA
Exchange MVP 2007
Microsoft Certified Partner
"Chris Lukowski" <ChrisLukowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:C23AEE0B-FA25-4959-A3FB-5389D912610D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
Due to security concerns about their laptops being used as piggybacks for
hackers, our IT manager wants to move away from having our clients connect to
our Exchange 2003 server using VPN connections that potentially open up our
entire network. Since that is their only reason for doing so, we think an RPC
over HTTP setup for Oulook would tighten up security quite a bit since they
won't be able to access any of our network shares that way. The question now
is how to properly configure it. Right now we have a single server
environment with OWA w/ SSL installed and want to know if the proper way to
implement RPC over HTTP is with a second Front End server. We are willing to
drop the money if it buys us tangible security, but if there really isn't an
advantage then I'd rather just use our existing Exchange server to configure
it on. I just need to know the facts before making this decision. Please
advise.
Thanks.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: How 2 dump users storage limits settings in A/D?
- Next by Date: Re: Backup Across WAN/VPN for Disaster Recovery
- Previous by thread: mx record priorties.. correct? exchange failure - no bounce backs? rollernet ok?
- Next by thread: Re: RPC over HTTP: Single server or FE/BE setup?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|