RAID 10 still best for DB's?
- From: "Gonzo" <no@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:00:11 +0100
We run Exchange 2003 Enterprise. We have 3 Mailbox stores which had 1-2
databases in each and each maiailbox store in on a RAID 10 partition.
We use to have them on RAID 5 at it was very slow sometimes, our average
writes/reads to disk per second were sometimes hitting > 50 msecs. Now on
RAID 10 we sometimes get the odd >30 msecs but many when backups are
running.
We are going to be upgrading our server soon, would RAID 10 be the best way?
Plus we will eventually upgrade this new server to Exchange 2007.
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Server Upgrade
... My old machine has 2 80gb sata drives on a raid 1. ... Depending on what u going to do with the server, but dual rankedd 1GB offers better performance. ... Install and configure to use Data on D or E partition. ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.general) - Re: Server Upgrade
... My old machine has 2 80gb sata drives on a raid 1. ... I will be running Microsoft Small Business Server 2003 R2 with SP2 Standard Edition. ... Dell sets the entire thing up on one partition. ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.general) - fedora-list-request@redhat.com
... Anybody have any experience with RAID controllers under ... >> is not found on that server. ... > If nVidia were to do something silly I could swap the card in a matter ... > the usb drives and then reboot to linux to get them working properly. ...
(Fedora) - Re: Single Partition on SBS? Quadcore Processor?
... the remaning of the 300 gigs on the D partition. ... I am planning on running a Raid 5 setup with four 146gig 15k SAS ... on a Windows 2000 Server Std with SQL 2000 on it and it runs on a Dual ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs) - Re: HP proliant ML115 G5 on debian lenny
... dardrives to do RAID 1 backup for several other servers. ... simple backup server, any drive over 1 GB will hold all the ... system onto a 6 GB partition on one of the drives. ...
(Debian-User) |
|
