Re: is it a problem to install 931836 on client *before* updating server?
- From: "Tara" <TSBallard@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 2 Mar 2007 01:42:10 -0800
On Feb 27, 9:23 pm, "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" <bharatsun...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
That's the preferred/recommended way, but don't let too much time pass
between the clients getting 931836 and your rebasing. Appointments created
between the time they get 931836 time zone update to when you rebase may get
wrongly rebased.
--
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchangewww.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------------------------
<skywise...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1172621846.118215.38730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
i'm just wondering if there will be a problem with installing the
KB931836 on our XP client machines before doing any other DST
updates? i can easily go through and change this if i have to, but i
want to know if it will cause that much of a problem in the grand
scheme of things.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I have a follow-up question to this one.
What if the client machines were updated and the tzmove.exe tool run
on those clients right afterward? Does it matter if a day or so
passes before KB931836 and the Exchange CDO patch is installed on the
servers?
This happened yesterday after some clients did a Windows Update on
their own. Luckily, it was caught, and I ran tzmove on those
workstations. We have opted not to run the tool from Exchange (we're
a small shop).
Thanks!
Tara
Tara
.
- Prev by Date: How to configure Client Access Server for Proxying?
- Next by Date: RE: DST update for Exchange 2003 and Outlook 2003
- Previous by thread: How to configure Client Access Server for Proxying?
- Next by thread: Re: Recover single email from Exchange 2003
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
