Re: Question on KB926666 which can lead to KB932599



On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:07:18 -0500, Andy David {MVP}
<adavid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:59:29 -0500, "Adam Raff"
<adamraff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Good Day,



After reviewing all the updates, I was getting ready to install the desktop
and Server updates KB931836 and low and behold I noticed a issue with
KB926666. The issue is that you may have a Store.exe problem after this
update is run. My Current Store.exe is 6.5.7650.28 which I believe I
updated when we went to SP2 for Exchange 2003.



My question, is there a way to determine if we are going to have an issue
with this update before we install 926666? It looks like after this update
is installed and you have a problem, the whole store is down and there is no
simple way to fix it.



Can we not apply 926666 and wait until the end of the DST time and next year
the problem is over like the desktops and servers if we apply the server and
desktop updates?

The KB tells you how to resolve. Or just install the hotfix.

oops. I mean Uninstall the hotfix!





Thank You
Adam Raff

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: SUS
    ... > I have setup a SUS Server on win2k. ... 0-2.reg will not configure your machine to automatically download updates from ... critical updates or service packs that your machine needs. ... It will also ask you if you want to install them, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • Re: Disaster Restore SBS2003
    ... If you had the server set to download updates automatically (never ... then install any service packs to return the server to the same service pack ... have the correct version of NTBackup prior to the restore. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Cannot activate SBS 2003 SP2
    ... the old array was a raid 5 that should not have become so rooted but the twit who built the server did not actually enable the spare drive to act as a spare!! ... The problem is SBS is unique and I've rarely if ever seen it work. ... The server has been chugging away in a small business environment for several years and I have administered it for them for about a year making sure that the updates were installed and their mailboxes were managed etc etc. ... My main reason for slipstreaming the install is because I cannot get the original 2003 server install to cope with the new hardware and it falls over part way into the install - BSOD bit. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Cannot activate SBS 2003 SP2
    ... everywhere and sitting on the case of the server is the old board - balanced ... slip stream SBS you would have had it ages ago. ... My main reason for slipstreaming the install is because I cannot get ... updates that need to be applied if one is to have a succesful outcome ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Cannot activate SBS 2003 SP2
    ... everywhere and sitting on the case of the server is the old board - balanced ... slip stream SBS you would have had it ages ago. ... My main reason for slipstreaming the install is because I cannot get ... updates that need to be applied if one is to have a succesful outcome ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)