Re: RFC 952
- From: "Jay" <jay.woller@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Feb 2007 08:58:37 -0800
On Feb 1, 12:04 am, "Ed Crowley [MVP]" <cursp...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Have you tried changing its name in DNS?
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
"Jay" <jay.wol...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1170290040.592680.15090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 31, 4:12 pm, "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" <bharatsun...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Did you try changing the fqdn in SMTP VS properties?
--
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchangewww.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:www.exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------------------------
"Jay" <jay.wol...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1170280658.290830.70590@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Having mail communications problem with one domain. They have their
server configured to only receive mail from other servers meeting all
RFC standards. The message below is what the admin sees on his side
when we try to send mail.
2007-01-10 12:39:19 rejected HELO from mail.abcdomain.com [IP
address]: syntactically invalid argument(s):
exchange_server.mail.abcdomain.com
underscore is not a valid character for hostnames - therefore we are
rejecting the message. they must remove the underscore from their
hostname
before we can accept mail from them
This is an Exchange 2003 server and I'm not able too just rename the
server obviously. Could I resolve this issue by setting up a smart
host or front server to just send mail for the organization?- Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Yes I changed this setting. When you telent into the box it responds
with correct host name but I guess when it communicates with this UNIX
server it is showing the full name.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Should I create another DNS entry or cname internallly for
mail.domain.com? I guess I'm not sure how this would change how the
mail server communicates with another server. When it announces itself
it is passing the host name. I figured this was part of the
intelligence of the information store.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC 952
- From: Ed Crowley [MVP]
- Re: RFC 952
- References:
- Re: RFC 952
- From: Jay
- Re: RFC 952
- From: Ed Crowley [MVP]
- Re: RFC 952
- Prev by Date: exch 2003 Pre SP2 backup
- Next by Date: eseutil offline
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC 952
- Next by thread: Re: RFC 952
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading