Re: Query-Based Distros for Sender Restriction
- From: "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" <bharatsuneja@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:01:41 -0800
- It would probably be worth trouble-shooting why the authenticated users
option does not work in your environment.
- Other options from previous post are still still available, including
Recipient Filtering.
--
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchange
www.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
www.exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------------------------
"Aaron" <Aaron.Smith@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1169059400.524183.89660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Well, I had thought about doing that, but we have users that are using
a variety of mail clients include things like Mozilla Mail that use
SMTP/IMAP to talk to the Exchange server. I'm assuming that these
clients would be treated as "anonymous" senders unless they were
configured for SMTP Authentication. Also, there's something odd about
our Exchange setup that causes the "Only Authenticated Users" option to
not work. If I set a group to only accept mail from authenticated
users, it doesn't seem to have any effect as I can continue to send
messages to that group from external addresses (such as my personal
home email account). I remember digging and digging and finding a
reason for this a while back, but I can't remember what that reason was
or why I didn't change it.
As a side note, Query based distribution lists apparently do NOT work
for sender restriction even though the gUI will let you add them. I
have to add either a static list or a single user for mail to be
allowed.
Bharat Suneja [MVP] wrote:
Why not setup the other distributin groups to receive mail from
authenticated senders only? This ensures those lists don't get internet
from anonymous/unauthenticated senders.
Alternatively, you can change the default email address of the
distribution
groups to something that's not reachable from outside, e.g.
dl1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yet another option is to add those dist groups to Recipient Filtering and
enable Recipient Filtering on the SMTP VS.
However, the first option is far easier to implement and is specifically
meant to address this issue. Your proposed solution, even if it did work,
will consume more resources and isn't really required.
--
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchange
www.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
www.exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Query-Based Distros for Sender Restriction
- From: Aaron
- Re: Query-Based Distros for Sender Restriction
- References:
- Query-Based Distros for Sender Restriction
- From: Aaron
- Re: Query-Based Distros for Sender Restriction
- From: Bharat Suneja [MVP]
- Re: Query-Based Distros for Sender Restriction
- From: Aaron
- Query-Based Distros for Sender Restriction
- Prev by Date: Re: Blackberry Server with Two Exchange 2003 servers
- Next by Date: DST Patch issues?
- Previous by thread: Re: Query-Based Distros for Sender Restriction
- Next by thread: Re: Query-Based Distros for Sender Restriction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|