Re: Ok to use mount points on a single-server E2K3 with DAS?
- From: "Alan" <bruguy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Nov 2006 14:16:01 -0800
Thanks to all. If there are no technical issues, then I suppose it's
just down to personal taste.
Having a drive called TransLogs instead of D: just seems neat to me.
Certainly more obvious what the drive is used for.
james chong wrote:
Ran four node cluster which all had their T logs on mount points never
had any issues or some trade off.
James Chong
Alan wrote:
Hello,
Just wondering if there are any negative side-effects to using mount
points instead of drive letters on a single server with direct-attached
storage running E2K3?
So we'd create C:\TransactionLogs pointing to a mirrored pair,
C:\Database pointing to a 3-disk RAID5 array and use C: itself for the
OS and Exchange binaries. We'll never run out of drive letters but
mount points do look clearer.
Thanks,
- Alan.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ok to use mount points on a single-server E2K3 with DAS?
- From: Oliver Moazzezi
- Re: Ok to use mount points on a single-server E2K3 with DAS?
- From: Alan
- Re: Ok to use mount points on a single-server E2K3 with DAS?
- References:
- Ok to use mount points on a single-server E2K3 with DAS?
- From: Alan
- Re: Ok to use mount points on a single-server E2K3 with DAS?
- From: james chong
- Ok to use mount points on a single-server E2K3 with DAS?
- Prev by Date: Re: Exchange server crashes
- Next by Date: Re: Message build-up in queue
- Previous by thread: Re: Ok to use mount points on a single-server E2K3 with DAS?
- Next by thread: Re: Ok to use mount points on a single-server E2K3 with DAS?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|