Re: Recommendations on Front end mail secuity
- From: "Matthew Kitchin \(Usenet/Lists\)" <mkitchin.public@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:54:27 -0500
Rich Matheisen [MVP] wrote:
"Matthew Kitchin \(Usenet/Lists\)" <mkitchin.public@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If you are up for it, build your own for free.
Linux/Postfix/Amavisd/Spamassassin combination will run like a champ.
And it runs tht way on the spammers machines too. They like to use it
to tune their messages to avoide spam filters! :-O
Not so true. That is just the basis of it. How you customize it is
completely up to you. Many of the commercial antispam solutions have this at
their guts. I went from sybari antispam catching 35,000 emails a week with
way to many false positives, to a custom solution catching 100,000 emails a
week with less than 10 false positives.
-Matthew
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recommendations on Front end mail secuity
- From: Rich Matheisen [MVP]
- Re: Recommendations on Front end mail secuity
- References:
- Recommendations on Front end mail secuity
- From: SMR
- Re: Recommendations on Front end mail secuity
- From: Matthew Kitchin \(Usenet/Lists\)
- Re: Recommendations on Front end mail secuity
- From: Rich Matheisen [MVP]
- Recommendations on Front end mail secuity
- Prev by Date: Re: can you change the time that a message is in the queue?
- Next by Date: Re: virtual smtp
- Previous by thread: Re: Recommendations on Front end mail secuity
- Next by thread: Re: Recommendations on Front end mail secuity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|