Re: more than two MX record
- From: naguaramipana <naguaramipana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 19:56:02 -0700
B
Thanks for battle with me on this.
I only have one domain(mydomain), my MX record is mail.mydomain.com, I
think this is pretty standar.-
I would like to create another MX record mailbox.mydomain.com to point to
the second ip address and therefore to my router number two
Thanks
"Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
If you are using separate domains as you explained, it'll work. The.
customers needing to bypass the filter will need to send to the second
domain that can directly send messages to your Exchange server. On your
server, you will need to create Recipient Policy for that domain so
Recipients have the necessary email addresses from the new domain as
proxyAddresses.
However, given this scenario, when your internal Recipient replies to an
email, it will go out using the default email address, irrespective of which
email address it was received on. When remote Recipients reply to those
responses, they will go to the default email address domain, and thus be
subjected to the filters.
--
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchange
www.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
www.exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------------------------
"naguaramipana" <naguaramipana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:08267493-D1C4-4BB0-AA9C-C1646597B4B8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
B.
Thanks
so in other words the following scenario wont work
on my ISP site
MX record mail.domain.com->xxx.xxx.xxx.xx1
MX record mailbox.domain.com ->xxx.xxx.xxx.xx2
on my site
router #1 xxx.xxx.xxx.xx1->spam firewall-> exchange server
router #2 xxx.xxx.xxx.xx2->exchange server
client side
outgoing server mailbox.domain.com
incoming server mailbox.domain.com
every other client
outgoing preferred ISP
incoming preferred ISP
pointing of course to mail.domain.com
please advise
"Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
Don't think most MTAs have any support for using specific MX records, so
as
posted earlier I don't think that particular approach will work.
All you need to do is allow your router to forward SMTP traffic inbound
on
the second/new IP to the Exchange server directly, then have the
postmaster
in the sending organization hard-code that in their system - you can do
it
by IP address or insert an A record mapping to that IP address in your
external DNS. If the sending domain is using Exchange, all they need to
do
is set up an SMTP Connector for your domain, and specify the second IP
address/fqdn as a smarthost.
--
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchange
www.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
www.exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------------------------
"naguaramipana" <naguaramipana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message
news:8961B913-1830-47CC-A3E6-617539EFA85F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
B.
Thanks for the prompt reply.
here is were I am.- I have two static public ip from my isp, then I
have
two routers one for each ip address, my isp holds my external dns and
Mx
record.
1) my now in service MX record mail.domain.com points to router number
one
and from here my router sends all email for my domain to a spam
firewall
and
from here all goes to my exchange server
2) I want certain user outside my network to use a second MX record
mailbox.domain.com and get that mx record pointing to my second IP
address
which goes to the second router and from here directly to my same
exchange
server.
is this possible, what do you think
Thanks
"Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
Yes, you can add an additional A record mapping another fqdn to the
second
IP, and point a new MX to it.
What are you trying to accomplish with this?
- If you add this with the same priority/preference number as the
existing
one, these will load-balance (DNS round-robin). h
- If you add the second one with a higher number, mail will only be
routed
to it if the first one fails.
If the outside user wants to send to the second/new IP address, it
will
need
to be hard-coded in the sender's environment - if they use Exchange,
they
will need to setup a SMTP Connector for your address space and specify
the
second/new IP as a smarthost.
In that case, you do not need to add a new MX record (which will allow
outside email to bypass your spam firewall at some point.. ).
Perhaps a better way to do this:
- Create an additional SMTP virtual server for that org, mapping the
second
external IP address to it on your firewall
- Create smtp/ip filters to accept connections only from that Org's ip
address(es)
- Optionally, set up SMTP authentication on the VS
--
Bharat Suneja
MVP - Exchange
www.zenprise.com
NEW blog location:
www.exchangepedia.com/blog
----------------------------------------------
"naguaramipana" <naguaramipana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message
news:4894FB49-941B-418B-8D37-FDC05FED8E77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi gurus
I have and exchange 2000 server, two statics ip, two routers.- each
router
has it own Ip address.- my mx record points to one of my public IP
and
all
email comes through this using one of my router, then my router push
all
email to my spam firewall and my firewall push those emails to my
exchange
server.
I want some of my outside user to send email using the other router
and
bypass my spam firewall.
do I just create another MX record pointing to the next static ip
and
use
my
router to forward those email directly to my exchange server
my MX record mail.domain.com can I create the second MX record like
mailbox.domain.com and route this to exchange directly. let my user
know
what
the incoming and outgoing server mx record is?
Thanks guys
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: more than two MX record
- From: Bharat Suneja [MVP]
- Re: more than two MX record
- References:
- Re: more than two MX record
- From: Bharat Suneja [MVP]
- Re: more than two MX record
- From: naguaramipana
- Re: more than two MX record
- From: Bharat Suneja [MVP]
- Re: more than two MX record
- From: naguaramipana
- Re: more than two MX record
- From: Bharat Suneja [MVP]
- Re: more than two MX record
- Prev by Date: Re: RPC-HTTP very frustrating
- Next by Date: Re: Native Mode - Cross Administrative Group Move
- Previous by thread: Re: more than two MX record
- Next by thread: Re: more than two MX record
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|