Re: What is more important on Exchange
- From: "Martin Blackstone - MVP" <exchangemvp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 13:23:10 -0800
"Andy David - MVP" <adavid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:f4sr029q662b8ausl6f6pm90m29jcjishc@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 11:34:27 -0800, dave
<dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Okay, I've been asked to setup an Exchange Server 2003 and I was wondering
in
what order from most important to least important do you put the hardware?
Example, 1. Processor 2. Memory 3. Hard Drive space.
So would it be more important to have 1gig memory with 2 duel 3.2ghz xeon
processors with 3 73scsi drives in Raid 5
or
Pentium D Processor 830 @ 3.2ghz duel core, with 4 hard drives at 250gig
in
Raid 5 with 2gigs of ram?
Disk First, RAM , then processor.
Ill take what's behind door number 2
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What is more important on Exchange
- From: Mark Arnold [MVP]
- Re: What is more important on Exchange
- References:
- Re: What is more important on Exchange
- From: Andy David - MVP
- Re: What is more important on Exchange
- Prev by Date: Re: This outlook user - [WildPacket]
- Next by Date: Re: What is more important on Exchange
- Previous by thread: Re: What is more important on Exchange
- Next by thread: Re: What is more important on Exchange
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|