Re: Disck write latency > 50ms



Dump the RAID 5 and go RAID 10. The problem is write performance on Drive
F:

Let's assume a 4 disk RAID 5 vs. a 4 disk RAID 10 array. Further, let's
assume 10K RPM SCSI drives and a 2:1 read/write ratio.

RAID 5:

Write perf = P*N'/4 = 85*3/4 = 63.75 IOPS
read perf = P*N' = 85*3 = 255 IOPS
mixed perf = 255*.66+63.75*.33 = 168.3 + 21 = 189.3 IOPS


RAID 10

write perf = P*N/2 = 85*4/2 = 170 IOPS
read perf = P*N = 85*4 = 340 IOPS
mixed perf = 340*.66 + 170*.33 = 224.4 + 56.1 = 280.5 IOPS


That's a 100% increase in write performance and a 55.5% increase in overall
performance for RAID 10 for the same number of spindles. I would never
recommend RAID 5 for exchange.




"SW" <SW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:E072839C-D358-40B3-B67D-CA89B83840A2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It's the "writes" that are the problem, and when this is high our users
"nag". I use MOM 2005 with the Exchange Management Pack which alerts me
when
the Physical Disck Avg. Disk sec/write is greater than 50ms for 10 minutes
(it polls every 60 seconds). Here is one I got earlier:

Severity: Warning
Status: New
Source: PhysicalDisk: Avg. Disk sec/Write: 0 F:
Name: Disk Write Latencies > 50 msec (F: Drive)
Description: High Disk Write Latencies for the past 10 minutes
PhysicalDisk: Avg. Disk sec/Write: 0 F: value = 6.41240062645155E-02.
The
average over last 10 samples is 0.064124.
Domain: DOMAIN
Agent: EXCHANGE2003
Time: 2/22/2006 09:57:00


"Neil Hobson [MVP]" wrote:

RAID5 probably isn't the best answer. Are you using MOM to monitor this
server? Is it actually causing a problem to the users? In a nutshell,
you
should look to size your server correctly regarding disk IOPS. There are
a
number of articles on doing this, such as those by Rui Silva at
msexchange.org, or Microsoft's own paper called something like Optimizing
Storage for Exchange 2003.

--
Neil Hobson
Exchange MVP


"SW" <SW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:582F4999-F46F-4DAA-9B59-E60B3227B368@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
What can we do about disk latency that goes over 5ms at various time of
the
day?

We have an Exchange 2030 Ent server (400 users), 2 DB's 80gb and 10GB.

The high latency is on our F drive, he is our setup:

c: OS, Exchange program, paging file (RAID 1 channel 0)
e: Transaction logs (RAID 1 channel 1)
f: Databases (RAID 5 on a separate RAID card)

Usually the server runs below 20ms on the Avg. Disk sec/write what we
hit
50ms at stages throughout the day, especially first thing when everyone
logs
in.





.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Building a file server - advice please
    ... > connecting up 5 drives in a RAID5 system does not affect the Mean Time To ... > important reason to use a RAID system. ... Hardware controllers generally can have an additional spare disk configured ... Hardware raid presents each raid array to the host as one disk, ...
    (comp.os.linux.setup)
  • Re: Exchange connectivity issue question
    ... New hard drives in a Raid configuration on the same channel as existing ... You would then just move the Exchange data to these new drives. ... "connecting to exchange server" style pop up and the end users having to ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • Is it HighPoint, is it Seagate, or is it Windows 2000 Professional
    ... Then I tried to boot my system: Windows reported ... Barracuda disk running off a HighPoint HPT370A RAID ... never new that my drives were set up this way. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.setup)
  • Re: Is it HighPoint, is it Seagate, or is it Windows 2000 Professional
    ... As you've discovered Raid 0 has no fail safe redundancy, ... Then I tried to boot my system: Windows reported ... Barracuda disk running off a HighPoint HPT370A RAID ... never new that my drives were set up this way. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.setup)
  • Re: Paul and Old Man: Cannot fix RAID5 failure ...
    ... Considering 3 SATA drives spining up after powerdown may cause a 12V ... Now I need to concentrate on raid array or data recovery (if still ... I removed the drive reported in error, no boot or rebuild. ... I was considering a parallel WinXP installation on a 4th disk, ...
    (alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus)

Loading