new Administrative Group or new Storage Group?
We have a school running one Exchange 2003 Enterprise server.
There is the default Adminstrative Group which contains the mailboxes for
faculty/staff.
We'd like to give students mailboxes. Should I create a new Adminstrative
group for them, or a new Storage group?
Which is recommended, which will give me more conrol, etc.
It looks like I can't change the message size for just the student mailboxes
if I only create a Storage group.
thanks
chrism
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Trying to remove the Recovery Storage Group
... I can't see the users in the first storage group, ... I assume that you also see mailboxes for these users in your ... current/new store. ... Storage Group to restore the mailboxes into, ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs) - Re: Exchange in Recovery Mode
... Please don't delete and then recreate the accounts. ... Screen shot of the Mailboxes in ESM and error message when you run ... The legacyExchangeDN is ... list of mailboxes from a recovery storage group in Exchange Server 2003 ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs) - Re: Hosting many organisations using Exchange 2003 Std
... Standard Edition only supports a single Storage Group with a single mailbox ... Recipient Policies, making it much easier and hands-free (to some extent - ... But all the companys in the same Exchange Server, ... mailboxes from differents companys. ...
(microsoft.public.exchange.setup) - Re: Some mailboxes on one of two mailbox stores cant send
... transaction logs of each storage group). ... For Exchange news, links and tips, check: ... > mailbox store and am moving mailboxes into these stores ... > Everyone I moved to mailbox store on storage group one is ...
(microsoft.public.exchange2000.general) - Re: How to "move" public folders store from one storage group to the other
... time to move public folders store to this new storage group. ... preventing users from sending even though they had almost empty mailboxes. ...
(microsoft.public.exchange.admin) |
|
