Re: ReW: Spam and NDR
- From: "Robert Williams" <RobertW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:53:42 -0800
"Rich Matheisen [MVP]" <richnews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ogqts19nbv4528rsjgr7ng85jbnk6mu1kt@xxxxxxxxxx
> "Robert Williams"
> <RobertW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
> >I'm just portraying a scenario for other small businesses that may want other
> >options.
>
> Your opinion seems to be untested. In a pefect world you'd never have
> to send a NDR. In the real world it's polite to do so. In a perfect
> world there would be no spam, not e-mail worms, no viruses. Sadly,
> that's not the way things are. One day you'll come to work and your
> server will have fallen over after exhausting all its disk space, or
> you'll find yourself confronted with thousands of messages address to
> asti.spumonti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, etc.
>
> Unlike school, life tests first and teaches later. After your first
> test, you'll learn. :)
>
And it is just that, my *opinion*. Not everyone has had the same experiences
you have. Not everyone learns the same thing you do. From my *current*
experience, NDRs are not necessary. That experience may change, or may not.
I've been tested in many, many ways, all I'm sure are different from the life
tests you have taken. That's experience, and that is why no two people have the
same experience.
[snip]
>
> The size of your company has no relevance to the amount of junk mail
> you receive.
I'm guessing that statement is not entirely truthful. The more users you have
on the internet, the more possibilities there are that your domain name will get
out. More users going to a wider variety of NGs and websites. More potential
for users to be scammed or redirected to illegimate pages.
> >There is always a point where
> >good outweighs bad, and vice versa. That decision is up to each individual.
I
> >just believe that everyone should hear facts from both side and make that
> >decision themselves, not have the decision made for them. All I was doing
here
> >was presenting a scenario for others to look at.
>
> Since you seem firmly convinced that yours is the ideal situation for
> your company, I can only wish you luck with it.
It's working for me right now. If it stops working for me, I'll search for a
better solution.
> --
> Rich Matheisen
> MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
> MS Exchange FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Don't send mail to this address mailto:h.pott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Or to these, either: mailto:h.pott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:melvin.mcphucknuckle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- References:
- Re: Spam and NDR
- From: Andy David - [MVP]
- ReW: Spam and NDR
- From: Robert Williams
- Re: ReW: Spam and NDR
- From: Rich Matheisen [MVP]
- ReW: Spam and NDR
- From: Robert Williams
- Re: ReW: Spam and NDR
- From: Rich Matheisen [MVP]
- Re: Spam and NDR
- Prev by Date: How to see all GAL's???
- Next by Date: Re: adding 1,200 mailboxes - need advice.
- Previous by thread: Re: ReW: Spam and NDR
- Next by thread: Re: Spam and NDR
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|